Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Comparisons among quality assurance systems: from outcome assessment to clinical utility
1Department of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106, USA.
Abstract:
This special section describes contemporary systems for assessing the quality and effectiveness of service delivery. These systems have in common their commitment to the belief that by continuously monitoring treatment-related change, identifying problem cases, and providing feedback to clinicians or agencies regarding patient progress the benefits of treatment may be increased. Aside from their commonalities, much is to be learned from the varying ways with which these systems gather information and provide feedback to clinicians or health care managers. The methods vary both as a function of the sociopolitical climate of the country in which they were developed and of the personal preferences and assumptions of the developers. An articulation of these differences can be of interest to health care managers and to psychotherapy researchers.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

