Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

G Janetschek1, R Peschel, A Hobisch

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Innsbruck, Austria.

Journal of Endourology
|June 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trend analysis and regional tumor incidence in Germany for testicular cancer between 2003 and 2014.

Andrology·2019
Same author

[Unexpected differential diagnosis of urachal cancer].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2018
Same author

[Urolithiasis 2016 : Reliable, effective and low radiation exposure].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2016
Same author

[Patient blood management: Current state of the literature].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2015
Same author

[Cystectomy in the elderly patient].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2013
Same author

Resistance to the mTOR-inhibitor RAD001 elevates integrin α2- and β1-triggered motility, migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells.

British journal of cancer·2012
Same journal

Is Nonpapillary Puncture a Feasible Alternative to Papillary Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Procedure, Safety, and Outcomes of Patient-Controlled Sedation in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A 7-Year Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Benign Hyperplasia: A Preoperative Nomogram and a Postoperative Surveillance Protocol.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Bubble Trouble: The Thermal Risk of Ureteral Laser Lithotripsy in an Air Bubble.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Development of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥2 Complications after Unilateral Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty in UPJO: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Appendiceal Onlay Ureteroplasty and Appendiceal Interposition Ureteroplasty for Complex Proximal Ureteral Strictures in Children: Insights Gained from Long-Term Follow-Up.

Journal of endourology·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) offers a less invasive approach for testicular tumors. This technique demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to open surgery with significantly reduced morbidity.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is crucial for staging testicular tumors.
  • Open RPLND can be associated with significant morbidity.
  • Laparoscopic techniques aim to reduce surgical complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic RPLND for clinical stage I and II testicular tumors.
  • To compare the morbidity and diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopic RPLND with open surgery.
  • To assess tumor control after laparoscopic RPLND.

Main Methods:

  • A total of 125 patients underwent laparoscopic RPLND between 1992 and 1999.
  • Patients included those with clinical stage I (n=76) and stage II (n=49) testicular tumors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collected included operative time, complications, hospital stay, and follow-up for recurrence.

    • Main Results:

    • Laparoscopic RPLND was successfully completed in most patients, with a steep learning curve.
    • Mean operative time decreased significantly after overcoming the learning curve.
    • Minor complications like lymphoceles and chylous ascites occurred; hospital stay was short. Tumor recurrence was minimal and not attributed to surgical failure.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic RPLND is a feasible and effective procedure for testicular tumors, even post-chemotherapy.
    • It achieves diagnostic accuracy comparable to open RPLND.
    • The laparoscopic approach offers significantly lower morbidity without compromising tumor control.