Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Categorization processes in mental comparisons.

C G Cech1, E J Shoben

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 70504-3131, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|June 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cross-category structure in semantic memory.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

The role of part-whole information in reasoning about relative size.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

The effects of prior processing episodes on basic-level superiority.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·1997
Same author

The role of categorical information in processing relational attributes.

Memory & cognition·1996
Same author

The role of expectancy in comparative judgments.

Memory & cognition·1989
Same author

Context and structure in conceptual combination.

Cognitive psychology·1988
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Categorization significantly impacts mental comparisons, especially with infinite sets. Category-based congruity effects depend on item presentation and range information, influencing cognitive processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making
  • Perception

Background:

  • Mental comparisons often involve categorization, influencing how individuals perceive and evaluate items.
  • Category-based congruity effects, where similarity to a category influences judgment, are a key aspect of mental comparison.
  • Understanding these effects is crucial for explaining cognitive processes in judgment and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate categorization and category-based congruity effects in mental comparisons.
  • To examine how the presentation of additional items (once vs. repeatedly) affects categorization of infinite sets.
  • To explore the role of item size and non-size dimensions in category-based congruity effects.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted, focusing on the categorization of infinite-set small items.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments manipulated the type of additional items presented (small, large, non-size dimensions) and their frequency (once or repeatedly).
  • The occurrence of category-based congruity effects for critical small items was analyzed across different experimental conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • A complete congruity effect was observed only in Experiments 1 and 3, suggesting specific conditions are necessary.
    • Categorization of infinite-set items may rely solely on range information under certain circumstances (Experiment 1).
    • Multiple categorizations based on multiple ranges might necessitate greater attentional effort (Experiment 2).

    Conclusions:

    • Categorization appears to be a central cognitive process in mental comparison.
    • The ease of categorization and the manifestation of congruity effects vary depending on the experimental paradigm.
    • These findings highlight the dynamic interplay between categorization, item properties, and cognitive effort in mental comparisons.