Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2026

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
Published on: December 18, 2016
The autopsy and medical fallibility: a historical perspective
1Autopsy Service, Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Abstract:
The three major factors causing the decline of nationwide autopsy rates to 0% to 5% are presented in historical perspective. One is the evolution of a perception by the public and doctors that infallible medical practice is a realistic goal in spite of the inevitability of unavoidable errors. Another is the structure of our tort-claim/liability insurance system that results in holding physicians culpable and financially responsible for injuries to patients by unavoidable errors. The third factor is the reluctant neglect of the autopsy by pathologists whose higher priorities are patient-care services. Inadequate funding for services and facilities to offset the lack of any income production has heightened neglect of the service. Remedies are presented for consideration.
Insights
Nationwide autopsy rates have plummeted to 0-5% due to the pursuit of medical infallibility, a litigious environment, and pathologist neglect. Addressing these factors is crucial for improving medical accuracy and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Science
- Pathology
- Healthcare Policy
Background:
- Autopsy rates have declined significantly nationwide, reaching 0-5%.
- This decline impacts medical education, quality control, and public health surveillance.
- Understanding the contributing factors is essential for potential interventions.
Observation:
- Public and physician perception increasingly expects infallible medical practice, ignoring the inevitability of errors.
- The medical tort-claim and liability insurance system penalizes physicians for unavoidable errors.
- Pathologists are increasingly neglecting autopsies due to competing priorities and inadequate funding.
Findings:
- The decline is driven by unrealistic expectations of medical perfection.
- The legal and insurance framework discourages comprehensive medical error analysis.
- Pathologists' focus on patient care services and lack of financial incentives for autopsies contribute to neglect.
Implications:
- Revisiting the perception of medical infallibility is necessary.
- Reforming the medical liability system could encourage diagnostic procedures like autopsies.
- Increased funding and recognition for autopsy services are vital for medical advancement.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Ethics in Research
Overview of Anatomy and Physiology
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.

