Related Experiment Videos
Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins
C A Mitchell1, M R Pintado, W H Douglas
1School of Clinical Dentistry, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom. c.mitchell@qub.ac.uk
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|June 19, 2001
Summary
Accurate artificial crown fit is crucial to prevent periodontal disease. Nondestructive profilometry revealed variations in marginal fit among different crown types, with porcelain crowns showing greater discrepancies.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Prosthodontics
- Biomaterials engineering
Background:
- Accurate artificial crown fit is essential to prevent plaque accumulation and periodontal disease.
- Existing marginal fit assessment methods are often destructive or limited in scope.
- Marginal deficiencies in dental crowns increase the risk of oral health complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the in vitro marginal fit of four complete crown types on human premolar teeth.
- To evaluate the efficacy of nondestructive profilometry for assessing crown marginal fit.
- To determine if crown type or tooth surface morphology (grooved vs. ungrooved) influences marginal fit.
Main Methods:
- Four crown types were prepared: bonding alloy (BA), gold alloy (G), porcelain with chamfer (PC), and porcelain with shoulder (PS) finish lines.
- Profilometry was used to measure absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) on grooved and ungrooved tooth surfaces.
- Measurements were taken on prepared teeth and on teeth with seated, un-cemented crowns.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in marginal fit were found between crown types for most parameters.
- Porcelain crowns (PC and PS) generally exhibited greater marginal discrepancies than alloy crowns (BA and G).
- Tooth surface morphology had a limited significant effect on marginal fit, except for vertical leading edge (LE) measurements.
Conclusions:
- Nondestructive profilometry provides an accurate method for evaluating absolute marginal fit of dental crowns.
- Marginal fit varied circumferentially, highlighting the limitations of subjective clinical assessments.
- Crown type significantly impacts marginal fit, with implications for material selection and fabrication processes.