Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision-making.

P A Klaczynski1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA. pak21@psu.edu

Child Development
|June 19, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Adolescent reasoning shows a gap between ideal standards and actual performance. Middle adolescents bridge this gap more than younger teens, suggesting developmental improvements in analytic reasoning processes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Educational trajectory and "action orientation": Grade and track differences.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
Same author

Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: a two-process approach to adolescent cognition.

Child development·2000
Same author

Personal theories, intellectual ability, and epistemological beliefs: adult age differences in everyday reasoning biases.

Psychology and aging·2000
Same author

Representations as mediators of adolescent deductive reasoning.

Developmental psychology·1998
Same author

Development of scientific reasoning biases: cognitive versus ego-protective explanations.

Developmental psychology·1998
Same author

A change in viewpoint promotes use of height-in-picture as a depth cue in 5- to 7-year-olds' drawings of a simple depth relationship.

Journal of experimental child psychology·1997

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • The normative/descriptive gap highlights the difference between ideal reasoning standards and actual human reasoning.
  • Understanding this gap is crucial for cognitive development and rationality research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between age and the normative/descriptive gap in adolescents.
  • To explore the underlying cognitive systems influencing reasoning performance.

Main Methods:

  • Adolescents completed reasoning and decision-making tasks.
  • Correlational and factor analyses were used to examine response patterns and processing systems.

Main Results:

  • Middle adolescents demonstrated performance closer to normative ideals than early adolescents.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two distinct processing systems were identified: analytic (decontextualized, conscious) and heuristic (contextualized, efficient).
  • Analytic processing showed stronger links to age and intelligence.

    • Conclusions:

    • Reasoning performance in adolescents improves with age, yet a significant normative/descriptive gap persists.
    • Distinct analytic and heuristic cognitive systems contribute to reasoning, with analytic processing developing more with age.
    • Findings inform theories of cognitive development, competence vs. performance, and rationality.