Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy
Published on: June 17, 2018
Management of major pancreatic duct injuries in children
1Division of Pediatric Surgery, General Thoracic Surgery, Children's Hospital, 3030 Children's Way, San Diego, CA 92123.
Insights
Pediatric pancreatic ductal injuries from blunt trauma are rare. Acute endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) offers accurate diagnosis and stenting treatment in children, improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Trauma Management
Background:
- Management of pediatric pancreatic ductal injuries is controversial.
- Computed tomographic (CT) scans lack accuracy in diagnosing injury type and location.
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stenting are explored for definitive diagnosis and treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role of ERCP in diagnosing and treating pediatric pancreatic ductal injuries.
- To compare operative and nonoperative management strategies.
- To assess the accuracy of CT scans in pediatric blunt trauma pancreatic injuries.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 18 pediatric patients with major pancreatic ductal injuries over 14 years.
- Analysis of injury mechanisms, diagnostic methods (CT, ERCP), management, and outcomes.
- Inclusion of recent cases managed with acute ERCP and endoscopic stenting.
Main Results:
- CT scans were suggestive but not definitive in diagnosing injuries.
- Distal pancreatectomy was performed for distal injuries; nonoperative management led to pseudocysts for proximal injuries.
- Acute ERCP and endoscopic stenting in two recent cases resulted in rapid clinical improvement and normal follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Pancreatic ductal injuries are rare in pediatric blunt trauma.
- CT scanning is insufficient for accurate diagnosis; ERCP is safe and accurate for diagnosis and potential stenting treatment in children.
- Distal injuries treated with distal pancreatectomy; proximal injuries managed nonoperatively with pseudocyst drainage. ERCP stenting is a viable option for selected cases.
Background:
The operative versus nonoperative management of major pancreatic ductal injuries in children remains controversial. The computed tomographic (CT) scan may not be accurate for determination of location and type of injury. We report our experience with ductal injury including the recent use of acute endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for definitive imaging, and an endoscopically placed stent as definitive treatment. This has not been reported in children.
Methods:
In review of 14,245 admissions to a regional pediatric trauma center over a 14-year period, 18 patients with major ductal injuries from blunt trauma were noted. Records were reviewed for mechanism of injury, method of diagnosis, management, and outcome.
Results:
There were 10 girls and 8 boys, ranging in age from 2 months to 13 years. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle and bicycle crashes. Admission CT scan in 16 children was suggestive of injury in 11, and missed the injury in 5. Distal pancreatectomy was carried out in eight patients with distal duct injuries: one died of central nervous system injury. Nonoperative management in three proximal duct injuries suggested by initial CT scan and in three missed distal duct injuries resulted in pseudocyst formation in five survivors; one patient died of central nervous system injuries. Two children with minimal abdominal pain, normal initial serum amylase, and no initial imaging developed pseudocysts. Two of seven pseudocysts spontaneously resolved and five were treated by delayed cystogastrostomy. Two recent children with suggestive CT scans were definitively diagnosed by acute ERCP and treated by endoscopic stenting. Clinical and chemical improvement was rapid and complete and the stents were removed. Follow-up ERCP, CT scan, and serum amylase levels are normal 1 year after injury.
Conclusion:
Pancreatic ductal injuries are rare in pediatric blunt trauma. CT scanning is suggestive but not accurate for the diagnosis of type and location of injury. Acute ERCP is safe and accurate in children, and may allow for definitive treatment of ductal injury by stenting in selected patients. If stenting is not possible, or fails, distal injuries are best treated by distal pancreatectomy; proximal injuries may be managed nonoperatively, allowing for the formation and uneventful drainage of a pseudocyst.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...

