Long-term results justify autogenous infrainguinal bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal failure

S L Meyerson1, C L Skelly, M A Curi

  • 1Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Chicago, Ill., USA.

Insights

Infrainguinal bypass grafting in dialysis patients shows acceptable outcomes, particularly with autologous grafts. Limb salvage and survival rates exceed 50% at three years, challenging previous assumptions of poor results.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Nephrology
  • End-Stage Renal Disease Management

Background:

  • Infrainguinal bypass grafting for limb-threatening ischemia in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is often perceived as high-risk with poor outcomes.
  • This study investigates modern, long-term results of infrainguinal bypass grafting specifically in dialysis-dependent patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of infrainguinal bypass grafting in dialysis-dependent patients.
  • To compare outcomes in dialysis-dependent patients versus those with functioning kidneys.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 425 lower extremity revascularizations over 5 years at a single institution.
  • Separate analysis of 82 limbs in 64 dialysis-dependent patients.
  • Comparison of comorbidities, disease patterns, and surgical approaches between dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis patients.

Main Results:

  • Dialysis patients had higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and more distal vascular disease.
  • Perioperative mortality (4.9%) and 3-year autogenous graft patency (67%) were comparable to non-dialysis patients.
  • 3-year limb salvage (59%) and patient survival (60%) exceeded 50%, despite poorer outcomes with non-autogenous conduits.

Conclusions:

  • Infrainguinal revascularization is a viable option for dialysis-dependent patients with limb-threatening ischemia.
  • Acceptable perioperative and long-term results can be achieved, particularly when autologous conduits are utilized.
  • Outcomes support challenging the traditional view of poor results for this patient population.
Abstract