Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Relative risk estimation and inference using a generalized logrank statistic.

D V Mehrotra1, A J Roth

  • 1Clinical Biostatistics, Merck Research Laboratories, UN-A102, 785 Jolly Road, Bldg. C, Blue Bell, PA 19422, USA. devan_mehrotra@merck.com

Statistics in Medicine
|July 6, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current Practices in Choosing Estimands and Sensitivity Analyses in Clinical Trials: Results of the ICH E9 Survey.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2018
Same author

Rank-based principal stratum sensitivity analyses.

Statistics in medicine·2013
Same author

Vaccine clinical trials--a statistical primer.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2006
Same author

Statistical considerations for noninferiority/equivalence trials in vaccine development.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2006
Same author

Estimating the probability of a blood donation adverse event based on 1000 interviewed whole-blood donors.

Transfusion·2005
Same author

Simultaneous testing strategy for comparing two treatments in a stratified binomial trial.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2000
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

A new generalized logrank (GLR) statistic offers a more efficient alternative to the Cox proportional hazards model for small sample survival analysis. This method improves estimation and inference for relative risk, especially with fewer than 100 subjects per group.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Survival Analysis
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • The logrank test is optimal for comparing survival distributions when the hazard ratio is one.
  • The Cox proportional hazards model is standard for estimating relative risk but can be suboptimal in small samples.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate an alternative method for testing departures from a relative risk other than one and for estimating relative risk.
  • To address the limitations of the Cox model in small sample sizes.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a generalized logrank (GLR) statistic for estimation and inference.
  • Comparison of the GLR statistic with the Cox proportional hazards model.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The GLR approach and Cox model are asymptotically similar.
  • Empirical results show the GLR approach is more efficient than the Cox model for small sample sizes (< 100 subjects per group).

    • Conclusions:

    • The proposed GLR statistic provides a more efficient and robust method for survival analysis in small sample settings.
    • The GLR method is illustrated using survival data from cervical cancer patients.