Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A measured data set for evaluating electron-beam dose algorithms.

R A Boyd1, K R Hogstrom, J A Antolak

  • 1Department of Radiation Physics, Box 0094, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

Medical Physics
|July 7, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Population Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Exploratory Exposure-Response Analyses of Apixaban in Subjects Treated for Venous Thromboembolism.

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology·2017
Same author

SU-E-T-101: Dosimetry Intercomparison for a Synchrotron-Produced Monochromatic X-Ray Beam.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

SU-E-T-155: Dose Response Curve of EBT2 and EBT3 Radiochromic Films to a Synchrotron-Produced Monochromatic X-Ray Beam.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs. Enoxaparin for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Orthopedic Surgery: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis.

Clinical and translational science·2017
Same author

Evaluating the accuracy of a three-term pencil beam algorithm in heterogeneous media.

Physics in medicine and biology·2017
Same author

A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.

Medical physics·2015
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

This study developed a high-precision dataset for verifying electron-beam dose algorithms, improving upon previous efforts. The new data, validated by Monte Carlo simulations, offers superior accuracy for radiation therapy quality assurance.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Dosimetry

Background:

  • Electron-beam dose algorithms are crucial for accurate radiation therapy planning.
  • Existing verification datasets, like the Electron Collaborative Working Group (ECWG) data, may have limitations in precision and accuracy.
  • High-quality data is essential for validating and improving these algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To create a highly precise and accurate dataset for electron-beam dose algorithm verification.
  • To address systematic errors present in previous datasets.
  • To provide a superior dataset for evaluating electron beam dose calculation algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Measurements were performed in water using p-type diode detectors and a Wellhöfer dosimetry system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized 9 and 20 MeV, 15x15 cm² electron beams at varying source-to-surface distances (100 and 110 cm).
  • Included measurements on irregular surfaces (stepped, nose-shaped) and internal heterogeneities (bone, air cavities).
  • Validated measurements against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using the OMEGA/BEAM code.

    • Main Results:

    • Measurement precision was better than 0.5% in low-dose gradient regions.
    • Agreement between measured data and MC calculations was generally within 2%.
    • The developed dataset demonstrated superior quality compared to the ECWG dataset.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed dataset provides high precision and accuracy for electron-beam dose algorithm verification.
    • This dataset enables a more reliable evaluation of electron beam dose algorithms.
    • The dataset will be publicly available for research and clinical use.