Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Isolation of Intact, Whole Mouse Mammary Glands for Analysis of Extracellular Matrix Expression and Gland Morphology
Published on: October 30, 2017
Computerized image analysis of Ki-67 in ductal breast carcinoma in situ
D G Menter1, A Hoque, N Motiwala
1Departments of Clinical Cancer Prevention and Pathology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Objective:
To develop and determine the staining protocols and computerized image analysis methods that are the most effective combination for performing quantitative analysis of Ki-67.
Study Design:
We compared conventional bright-field light microscopy and refractive optical enhancement methods in combination with various immunodetection and filter enhancement methods, including immunogold in combination with epipolarization refractive optics and enzymatic conversion of chromogenic substrates in combination with optical filter enhancement. Initial Ki-67 tests were performed on lymph node tissues and cultured human breast cells and then applied to 200 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) samples. DCIS acini were digitally acquired, and a region of interest was manually outlined in each one with a digital stylus to include only the cellular component; then the Ki-67 staining index was quantified by segmentation analysis.
Results:
Although combining epipolarization analysis with immunohistogold staining was the most sensitive detection method, nonspecific binding was too high. The streptavidin-horseradish-peroxidase enzymatic conversion of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) in combination with optical enhancement filters was the most effective method tested. Ki-67 stain was associated with dense fibrillar structures of the nucleoli in the less intensely staining nuclei and was most intense in paired nuclei.
Conclusion:
The method of measuring Ki-67 expression by DAB staining combined with optical enhancement filters and quantification via computer-assisted image analysis techniques produced objective and reproducible results. As such, this method can offer (1) less intraobserver and interobserver variability, (2) a digital archival record, and (3) a baseline for digital exchange of information between studies.
More Related Videos
11:34Building Up a High-throughput Screening Platform to Assess the Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancers
Published on: December 5, 2017
06:05Multiplex Immunofluorescence Combined with Spatial Image Analysis for the Clinical and Biological Assessment of the Tumor Microenvironment
Published on: June 2, 2023