Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cancer development and progression: a non-adaptive process driven by genetic drift.

A Aranda-Anzaldo1

  • 1Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca. aaa@coatepec.uaemex.mx

Acta Biotheoretica
|July 14, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Cancer progression may not be driven by genetic mutations and natural selection. This research suggests tumor evolution is a random process, possibly epigenetic, linked to species turnover rather than cellular adaptation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding cancer as a formless phenomenon.

Medical hypotheses·2002
Same author

The Hox-gene research programme and the shortcomings of molecular preformationism.

Rivista di biologia·2000
Same author

p53 is a rate-limiting factor in the repair of higher-order DNA structure.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·1999
Same author

The normal association between newly replicated DNA and the nuclear matrix is abolished in cells infected by herpes simplex virus type 1.

Research in virology·1998
Same author

Loss of DNA loop supercoiling and organization in cells infected by herpes simplex virus type 1.

Research in virology·1998
Same author

A role for the nucleotype in the pathogenesis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Medical hypotheses·1993

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • The mainstream view posits cancer originates from genetic mutations, with tumor progression driven by natural selection acting on cells.
  • This perspective faces challenges in explaining how individual cells gain autonomy to respond to selection independently of the organism.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the genetic mutation and natural selection model of cancer development.
  • To propose an alternative framework for understanding tumor evolution and its underlying mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of the prevailing genetic mutation theory of cancer.
  • Theoretical argumentation against natural selection as the primary driver of tumor progression.
  • Exploration of epigenetic factors and genetic drift as alternative explanations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Qualitative changes in cells leading to tumor formation cannot be solely explained by genetic mutations.
  • Natural selection is unlikely to be the driving force behind tumor development and progression within an organism.
  • Tumor evolution is proposed as a random, non-adaptive process, not governed by fundamental biological principles of selection.

Conclusions:

  • Mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are likely consequences of genetic drift in genes irrelevant to post-reproductive fitness.
  • The origin of cancer may be epigenetic, stemming from the biological imperative for species turnover.
  • Cancer development might be an indirect consequence of organismal aging and the need for generational replacement.