Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Signature authentication by forensic document examiners.

M Kam1, K Gummadidala, G Fielding

  • 1Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. kam@minerva.ece.drexel.edu

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|July 14, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testosterone concentration coincides with distance travelled in the free-ranging male Saharan sand-viper, Cerastes vipera.

General and comparative endocrinology·2025
Same author

Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis.

Science robotics·2022
Same author

Semi-autonomous Robotic Anastomoses of Vaginal Cuffs Using Marker Enhanced 3D Imaging and Path Planning.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2021
Same author

Supervised Autonomous Electrosurgery via Biocompatible Near-Infrared Tissue Tracking Techniques.

IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics·2021
Same author

Cabergoline-related impulse control disorder in an adolescent with a giant prolactinoma.

Clinical endocrinology·2017
Same author

The prognostic value of the fracture level in the treatment of Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fracture in children.

The bone & joint journal·2015
Same journal

Correction to "The impact of institutional authority on forensic evidence evaluation by criminal justice professionals".

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Estimation of postmortem submersion interval based on microbial community composition in human remains recovered from aquatic environments.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Prevalence of novel psychoactive substances in selected clinical urine specimens submitted for drug monitoring.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

GenoEye: A machine learning-based framework for the prediction of intermediate eye color phenotypes.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Sharp force trauma analysis without animal bones: A proposal for sustainable and ethical bone proxies.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Absolute dating of modern paper using <sup>14</sup>C bomb peak data of the paper fibers.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
See all related articles

Forensic document examiners (FDEs) significantly outperform laypersons in signature examination accuracy. This study found FDEs made fewer errors in identifying genuine and forged signatures, regardless of monetary incentives for laypersons.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Psychology
  • Document Examination

Background:

  • Signature examination is crucial in legal contexts.
  • Previous research has not systematically compared the accuracy of forensic document examiners (FDEs) with laypersons in signature authentication.
  • Understanding these differences is vital for assessing evidence reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct the first controlled study comparing the signature examination abilities of FDEs and laypersons.
  • To quantify the error rates of both groups in distinguishing genuine from forged signatures.
  • To investigate the impact of monetary incentives on laypersons' performance.

Main Methods:

  • A signature-authentication/simulation-detection task was administered to both FDEs and laypersons.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants compared known genuine signatures with unknown signatures without prior knowledge of their authenticity distribution.
  • Laypersons were assigned to three different monetary incentive schemes.

    • Main Results:

    • FDEs and laypersons provided significantly different assessments of signature authenticity.
    • FDEs exhibited substantially lower error rates compared to laypersons in signature examination.
    • Type I (false positive) and Type II (false negative) error rates were markedly higher in laypersons than in FDEs.
    • Monetary incentives did not yield statistically significant differences in laypersons' performance.

    Conclusions:

    • Professional FDEs demonstrate superior accuracy in signature examination compared to laypersons.
    • The findings underscore the specialized expertise required for reliable forensic document analysis.
    • Layperson performance in signature examination is not significantly improved by monetary incentives.