Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Scientific certainty: research versus forensic perspectives.

S J Bird1

  • 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|July 14, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Supplemental peri-operative intravenous crystalloids for postoperative nausea and vomiting: an abridged Cochrane systematic review.

Anaesthesia·2019
Same author

Encephalopathy and peripheral neuropathy following diethylene glycol ingestion.

Neurology·2005
Same author

Clinical neurophysiology in the intensive care unit.

Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology·2003
Same author

Mentoring and the responsible conduct of research: reflections and future.

Science and engineering ethics·2001
Same author

Mentors, advisors and supervisors: their role in teaching responsible research conduct.

Science and engineering ethics·2001
Same author

Where are we? Where are we going?

Science and engineering ethics·2001
Same journal

GenoEye: A machine learning-based framework for the prediction of intermediate eye color phenotypes.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Sharp force trauma analysis without animal bones: A proposal for sustainable and ethical bone proxies.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Absolute dating of modern paper using <sup>14</sup>C bomb peak data of the paper fibers.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Forensic timeline investigation of Apple Health app on iOS.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Help v. harm: How a "lookup table" for evaluating DNA evidence given activity-level propositions could lead to wrongful convictions.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Development and Evaluation of an Iodoplatinate-Based Strip-Type Kit for On-Site Drug Screening in Beverages".

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
See all related articles

Science can inform legal cases, but understanding its limitations is crucial. Proper presentation and perception are key for accurate judicial use of scientific evidence.

Area of Science:

  • Interdisciplinary studies bridging science and law.
  • Legal system and scientific community interactions.

Background:

  • Societal structures and functions differ between scientific and judicial domains.
  • Potential for scientific information to aid legal decision-making.
  • Acknowledging limitations in scientific evidence is vital for its judicial application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the intersection of scientific evidence and judicial proceedings.
  • To highlight the importance of understanding scientific information's limitations in legal contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of scientific information transfer to the judicial system.
  • Examination of presentation and perception factors influencing scientific evidence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Scientific information can be valuable in judicial deliberations.
  • Limitations arise from how scientific data is presented and perceived.
  • Both providers and receivers of scientific information impact its judicial utility.

Conclusions:

  • Effective integration of science in law requires acknowledging and addressing inherent limitations.
  • Understanding the nuances of information presentation and perception is essential for accurate judicial use of scientific findings.