Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Molar versus as a paradigm clash.

W M Baum1

  • 1University of New Hampshire, USA. wm.baum@unh.edu

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|July 17, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The molar view of behavior, focusing on overall patterns, is more effective than the molecular view, which examines individual actions. This perspective offers a more productive framework for understanding behavior.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantitative prediction and molar description of the environment.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Richard J. Herrnstein: A memoir.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Rules, culture, and fitness.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Response to Harzem's review of modern perspectives on John B. Watson and classical behaviorism.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Response to Marr's and Zuriff's reviews of understanding behaviorism: Science, behavior, and culture.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Group choice: the ideal free distribution of human social behavior.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2001

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral science
  • Psychology
  • Learning theory

Background:

  • The molar view of behavior emerged due to limitations in contiguity-based explanations.
  • Two-factor theory, despite modifications, faces fundamental challenges when contrasted with the molar perspective.

Discussion:

  • The core difference between molar and molecular views lies in their fundamental paradigms.
  • The inadequacy of molecular explanations, particularly those relying solely on contiguity, necessitates alternative frameworks.

Key Insights:

  • The molar perspective provides a more productive approach to understanding behavior.
  • Paradigmatic differences highlight the distinct conceptual underpinnings of molar and molecular behaviorism.

Outlook:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Further research into the molar view can refine our understanding of complex behaviors.
  • Exploring the implications of the molar paradigm across different psychological domains is warranted.