Related Experiment Videos
Acute and long-term outcomes of stenting in coronary vessel > 3.0 mm, 3.0-2.5 mm, and < 2.5 mm
Insights
Coronary stenting in small arteries (< 2.5 mm) is safe acutely but shows higher restenosis and lower event-free survival long-term. Complex and long lesions predict restenosis in these small vessels.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Coronary artery stenting outcomes can vary based on vessel size.
- Small coronary arteries present unique challenges for interventional procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare acute and long-term outcomes of coronary stenting across different reference vessel diameters.
- To identify predictors of restenosis in very-small-vessel stenting.
Main Methods:
- A total of 1,152 patients undergoing coronary stenting were divided into three groups based on reference vessel diameter: >3.0 mm, 3.0-2.5 mm, and <2.5 mm.
- Outcomes including procedural success, stent thrombosis, in-hospital events, angiographic restenosis, and event-free survival were assessed.
- Stepwise regression analysis was used to identify predictors of restenosis.
Main Results:
- Procedural success, stent thrombosis, and in-hospital cardiac events were similar across all vessel size groups.
- The restenosis rate at 6 months was significantly higher in smaller vessels (26% in <2.5 mm vs. 14% in >3.0 mm).
- Event-free survival at ~28 months was lower in the smallest vessel group (71% vs. 85% in >3.0 mm). Complex and long lesions were independent predictors of restenosis in vessels <2.5 mm.
Conclusions:
- Coronary stenting in small arteries is safe and feasible with good acute outcomes.
- Long-term outcomes are less favorable in small coronary arteries, with higher restenosis rates and lower event-free survival.
- Complex and long lesions are key predictors of restenosis in very-small-vessel stenting, guiding future treatment strategies.
Abstract:
We compared the acute and long-term outcomes of stentings in coronary vessels > 3.0 mm, 3.0-2.5 mm, and < 2.5 mm. A total of 1,152 patients underwent coronary stenting was divided into three groups based on the reference vessel size. Group A consisted of 598 patients (667 lesions) with a reference vessel diameter > 3.0 mm, group B 485 patients (544 lesions) with a reference vessel diameter of 3.0-2.5 mm, and group C 114 patients (119 lesions) with a reference vessel diameter < 2.5 mm. The procedural success, stent thrombosis, and in-hospital cardiac event rate were similar in the three groups. At 6-month angiographic follow-up, the lesion restenotic rate was significantly higher in the small-vessel group (14%, 22%, and 26% in groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.011). These differences appeared to result from a lesser acute gain and a lesser net gain in small-vessel group; the late luminal loss was similar in the three groups. During a follow-up duration of 28 +/- 3 months, group C patients had a significantly lower rate of event-free survival than the group A and B patients (71% vs. 85% and 82%; P = 0.002). Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that complex lesion (P = 0.032) and long lesion (P = 0.046) are independent predictors of restenosis in very-small-vessel (< 2.5 mm) stenting. In conclusion, the acute results of stenting in small coronary arteries appear safe and feasible with a high procedural success rate and a low incidence of stent thrombosis. Stenting in patients with a small coronary artery appears to have a similar in-hospital cardiac event rate, but a higher angiographic restenosis rate and a lower event-free survival rate, compared to stenting in patients with a larger coronary artery. The predictors of restenosis in very-small-vessel stenting are complex lesions and long lesions. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:314-322.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care