Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Consumers versus managed care: the new class actions.

Health Affairs (Project Hope)

|July 21, 2001

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Consumers suing health maintenance organizations (HMOs) for fraud are unlikely to succeed. However, HMOs may have violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), warranting clearer disclosures and contracts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Health care as a (big) business: the antitrust response.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2002

Same author

Evidence: its meanings in health care and in law. (Summary of the 10 April 2000 IOM and AHRQ Workshop, "Evidence": its meanings and uses in law, medicine, and health care).

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2001

Same author

American health care and the law--we need to talk!

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2000

Same author

Vicarious liability: relocating responsibility for the quality of medical care.

American journal of law & medicine·2000

Same author

'Putting patients first': promise or smoke screen?

Health affairs (Project Hope)·1998

Same author

The place of private accrediting among the instruments of government.

Law and contemporary problems·1995

Same journal

National Health Expenditure Projections, 2025-34: Strong Utilization Growth Initially, Legislative Impacts Later.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026

Same journal

State Medicaid Programs Face Increased Spending On Medicare Premiums.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026

Same journal

Not enough time.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026

Same journal

Medicaid Tobacco And Nicotine Cessation Treatment Rates Remained Low, 2019-24.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026

Same journal

Third-Party Convener Firms And The Rise Of Geographically Dispersed, High-Earning Medicare ACOs.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026

Same journal

The Opacity Of Price Transparency.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Healthcare Law
Consumer Protection
Health Economics

Background:

Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) face class-action lawsuits alleging fraud.
HMOs have historically lacked transparency in business practices and contract adherence.
The introduction of cost controls by HMOs occurred in a market with limited existing controls.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the legal standing of fraud claims against HMOs under anti-racketeering laws.
To evaluate potential violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
To explore the implications of injunctive relief for market transparency and performance.

Main Methods:

Legal analysis of consumer class-action lawsuits against HMOs.
Examination of federal anti-racketeering legislation and ERISA.

Related Experiment Videos

Assessment of HMO business practices, disclosure methods, and contractual obligations.

Main Results:

Plaintiffs' fraud claims under anti-racketeering laws are unlikely to prevail.
HMOs' conduct suggests motives that may not warrant punitive sanctions for fraud.
HMOs likely violated ERISA due to inadequate disclosures and unclear contracts.

Conclusions:

Injunctive relief, mandating enhanced disclosures and clearer contracts, is a potential legal remedy.
Such reforms could legitimize HMO practices and improve overall healthcare market performance.
Focus should shift from punitive fraud damages to corrective measures for ERISA violations.