Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benchmarking and the laboratory.

M Galloway1, L Nadin

  • 1South Durham Health Care NHS Trust, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Cockton Hill, Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD, UK. mike.galloway@smpt.sdhc-tr.northy.nhs.uk

Journal of Clinical Pathology
|July 31, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Challenging Spontaneous Quantum Collapse with the XENONnT Dark Matter Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Search for Light Dark Matter in Low-Energy Ionization Signals from XENONnT.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

First Search for Light Dark Matter in the Neutrino Fog with XENONnT.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

First Indication of Solar ^{8}B Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Search for Pauli Exclusion Principle violations with Gator at LNGS.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2024
Same author

The XENONnT dark matter experiment.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2024

Benchmarking is essential for assessing laboratory performance in the UK. Two key schemes, the Clinical Benchmarking Company

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Healthcare Management
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Benchmarking is a critical tool for evaluating and improving laboratory performance.
  • The UK government's policy supports the continued use of benchmarking in healthcare.
  • Pathology services must demonstrate cost-effectiveness and high quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review benchmarking schemes for assessing laboratory performance.
  • To highlight the importance of benchmarking for pathology services in the UK.
  • To analyze specific areas of laboratory performance, including quality, productivity, clinical practice variation, skill mix, and working hours.

Main Methods:

  • Review of two benchmarking schemes: Clinical Benchmarking Company's Pathology Report and College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of five annual reports from the Clinical Benchmarking Company's scheme.
  • Examination of two Q-Probes studies: routine outpatient test turnaround time and outpatient test order accuracy.

    • Main Results:

    • The Clinical Benchmarking Company's Pathology Report provides detailed analysis of 10 laboratory performance areas.
    • The Q-Probes scheme offers insights into quality assurance but has limited UK participation.
    • Benchmarking enables demonstration of cost-effective and high-quality pathology services.

    Conclusions:

    • Benchmarking is an established and necessary practice for UK pathology services.
    • The reviewed schemes offer valuable data for performance assessment and improvement.
    • Pathologists can utilize benchmarking to prove the value and efficiency of their services.