Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contingency, causation, and adaptive inference.

D E Over1, D W Green

  • 1School of Humanities and Social Studies, University of Sunderland, England.

Psychological Review
|August 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bioinspired materials for regenerative medicine: going beyond the human archetypes.

Journal of materials chemistry. B·2020
Same author

Some requirements and suggestions for a methodology to develop knowledge based systems.

Ergonomics·2017
Same author

Cerebral oximetry and its role in adult cardiac, non-cardiac surgery and resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

Anaesthesia·2017
Same author

Correction: The nanotipped hairs of gecko skin and biotemplated replicas impair and/or kill pathogenic bacteria with high efficiency.

Nanoscale·2016
Same author

The nanotipped hairs of gecko skin and biotemplated replicas impair and/or kill pathogenic bacteria with high efficiency.

Nanoscale·2016
Same author

Four Functionally Distinct Regions in the Left Supramarginal Gyrus Support Word Processing.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2016
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

People overweight specific data points (a and b cells) in 2x2 contingency tables, a common heuristic. However, this simple approach can lead to errors in real-world judgments, requiring more nuanced assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Individuals often evaluate relationships between events using contingency judgment tasks.
  • A common pattern involves overweighting specific cells (a and b) in a 2x2 contingency table compared to others (c and d).
  • This weighting has been theoretically justified as a normative heuristic potentially adaptive for real-world scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the validity of overweighting specific cells in contingency judgment.
  • To determine if commonly used heuristics for contingency judgment are optimal for avoiding errors.
  • To propose that more subtle judgment strategies are necessary for accurate real-world assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of contingency judgment tasks involving two event types.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of data weighting patterns within a 2x2 contingency table framework.
  • Theoretical evaluation of existing heuristics against normative standards for judgment accuracy.

    • Main Results:

    • Empirical evidence confirms individuals disproportionately weight 'a' and 'b' cells over 'c' and 'd' cells in contingency judgments.
    • Theoretical analysis suggests these heuristics, while simple, can lead to systematic errors.
    • The study demonstrates that these heuristics are not always normatively justified for accurate real-world contingency assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • The prevalent heuristic of overweighting specific cells in contingency tables can lead to judgment errors.
    • More sophisticated and subtle cognitive strategies are required for accurate assessment of real-world contingencies.
    • Current heuristics may not be as adaptive as previously assumed for complex decision-making.