Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Abilities underlying decoding differences in children with intellectual disability.

F A Conners1, J A Atwell, C J Rosenquist

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0348, USA. fconners@gp.as.ua.edu

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research : JIDR
|August 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sustained attention to response task performance trajectories in Down syndrome.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2020
Same author

A cross-sectional analysis of executive function in Down syndrome from 2 to 35 years.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2017
Same author

Improving memory span in children with Down syndrome.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2008
Same author

Memory training for children with Down syndrome.

Down's syndrome, research and practice : the journal of the Sarah Duffen Centre·2001
Same author

Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs.

Annals of surgery·2001
Same author

Is the phonological loop responsible for intelligence-related differences in forward digit span?

American journal of mental retardation : AJMR·1998
Same journal

Evaluating Scoring Mechanisms for Measuring the Stroop Effect in Individuals With Down Syndrome.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026
Same journal

Identifying Key Gaps: A Qualitative Exploration of Physicians-in-Training Caring for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026
Same journal

Preliminary Testing of the English Version of the Adolescent Screener for Intelligence and Learning Disabilities (SCIL) Among Adolescents in Nigeria.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Mental Healthcare Need and Utilisation Among Asian American Adolescents With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026
Same journal

Repetitive Behaviours in Williams Syndrome: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Between the United Kingdom and Japan.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026
Same journal

Validation of the Q87.11 ICD Code for Prader-Willi Syndrome.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026
See all related articles

Children with intellectual disability (ID) who struggle with reading benefit most from strong phonological memory, specifically the ability to rehearse information. This skill is crucial for reading success, even more so than general intelligence or language abilities.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Special Education

Background:

  • Reading acquisition research often excludes children with intellectual disability (ID).
  • Understanding reading challenges in children with ID requires examining cognitive factors specific to this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cognitive differences between stronger and weaker reading decoders among children with intellectual disability (ID).
  • To identify which cognitive skills are most critical for reading success in children with ID.

Main Methods:

  • Compared 65 children with ID, divided into higher (n=21) and lower (n=44) decoding skill groups.
  • Assessed general intelligence, language ability, phonemic awareness, and phonological memory (including rehearsal).
  • Analyzed group differences, controlling for age and intelligence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Initially, stronger decoders had better language, phonemic awareness, and phonological memory rehearsal, but not intelligence. They were also older.
  • After controlling for age, only phonological memory rehearsal remained a significant differentiator.
  • Phonemic awareness was marginally significant when extreme low performers were excluded.

Conclusions:

  • Phonological memory rehearsal is a key factor for reading success in children with intellectual disability (ID).
  • This ability is more critical than general intelligence, language, or phonemic awareness in this population.
  • Difficulties may stem from poor phonological representation and output assembly.