Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risks and values in treatment decision making.

E J Kay1

  • 1Turner Dental School, University of Manchester, Manchester. Elizabeth.Kay@man.ac.uk

Primary Dental Care : Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)
|August 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oral care of palliative care patients - carers' and relatives' experiences. A qualitative study.

British dental journal·2018
Same author

Motivational interviewing in general dental practice: A review of the evidence.

British dental journal·2016
Same author

Application of Rasch analysis in the development and psychometric evaluation of dental undergraduates preparedness assessment scale.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2016
Same author

Is the value of oral health related to culture and environment, or function and aesthetics?

Community dental health·2016
Same author

Involving dental practitioners in setting the dental research agenda.

British dental journal·2014
Same author

Evidence-based dentistry--overcoming the challenges for the UK's dental practitioners.

British dental journal·2014
Same journal

A specialism of primary dental care? Prim Dent Care 2004;11(1)5-7.

Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)·2012
Same journal

A patient's view of dentistry 20 years ago, now, and in 20 years' time.

Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)·2012
Same journal

Reflections on the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) at 20 years.

Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)·2012
Same journal

Challenges to oral healthcare for older people in domiciliary settings in the next 20 years: a general dental practitioner's perspective.

Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)·2012
Same journal

Corporate dentistry in 2032?

Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)·2012
Same journal

Dental specialist lists: are they necessary?

Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)·2012
See all related articles

Oral health is a subjective patient experience, not just the absence of disease. Incorporating patient values through health state utilities ensures informed consent and better healthcare decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Oral Health
  • Healthcare Decision-Making
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • The 1984 Oral Health Strategy redefined oral health as subjective, encompassing more than disease absence.
  • Healthcare outcome evaluation should prioritize the patient's perspective over the provider's.
  • Patient evaluations of health outcomes are termed health state utilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the implications of subjective oral health definitions on healthcare.
  • To highlight the role of patient values in healthcare decision-making.
  • To emphasize the importance of health state utilities in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the 1984 Oral Health Strategy's definition of oral health.
  • Conceptual framework for incorporating patient values into decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of utility weighting in healthcare.

    • Main Results:

    • Healthcare outcomes are best evaluated by the individual patient.
    • Utility weighting integrates patient values into decision-making, even for aesthetic concerns.
    • This approach ensures informed consent and enhances patient-practitioner communication.

    Conclusions:

    • Patient-centered evaluation of oral health outcomes is crucial.
    • Utility weighting is a valuable tool for informed consent and shared decision-making.
    • Understanding health state utilities improves the patient-practitioner relationship.