Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Extending General Processing Tree Models to Analyze Reaction Time Experiments.

Xiangen Hu1

  • 1The University of Memphis

Journal of Mathematical Psychology
|August 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How meaningfulness and initial learning degree influence associative storage and retrieval processes: A multinomial processing tree and power function analysis.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

An innovative Socratic method-based artificial intelligence platform for healthcare education: A quasi-experimental study.

Nurse education in practice·2026
Same author

The association between self-presentation on social network sites and interpersonal relationship satisfaction among high school students: the chain mediating role of self-esteem and self-identity.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Status quo and predictors of Weibo users' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in 31 provinces in the Chinese mainland: Analysis based on supervised machine learning and provincial panel data.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Editorial: The role of teachers' emotions in students' outcomes: From the perspective of interpersonal emotions.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

The double-edged sword effect of argumentative scaffolding on group discussion in an adaptive discussion system.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same journal

Corrigendum to "An entropy model of decision uncertainty" [Journal of Mathematical Psychology 125 (2025), 102919].

Journal of mathematical psychology·2025
Same journal

An entropy model of decision uncertainty.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2025
Same journal

How do people build up visual memory representations from sensory evidence? Revisiting two classic models of choice.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2024
Same journal

Experiment-based calibration in psychology: Optimal design considerations.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2024
Same journal

Expressions for Bayesian confidence of drift diffusion observers in fluctuating stimuli tasks.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2024
Same journal

A Statistical Foundation for Derived Attention.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2023
See all related articles

This study extends General Processing Tree (GPT) models to analyze continuous response time (RT) data in cognitive psychology. The enhanced GPT framework models both accuracy and latency, providing insights into cognitive task processing stages.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometric Modeling

Background:

  • General Processing Tree (GPT) models are standard for analyzing categorical data in psychological experiments.
  • These models link observed behavior probabilities to unobservable choice probabilities in cognitive tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend General Processing Tree (GPT) models for the analysis of continuous data, specifically response time (RT) in cognitive psychology experiments.
  • To develop a framework for modeling tasks with discrete processing stages, incorporating both accuracy and latency measures.

Main Methods:

  • The study extends GPT models to handle continuous response time (RT) data.
  • It models observed response latencies as functions of choice probabilities and processing times (PT) within a serialized processing stage framework.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A general framework is presented and applied to empirical data.

    • Main Results:

    • The extended GPT models successfully analyze continuous RT data alongside categorical accuracy.
    • The functional relationships between observed latencies, choice probabilities, and processing times (PT) are determined by the task's processing structure.
    • The framework was applied to data from a source monitoring experiment.

    Conclusions:

    • General Processing Tree (GPT) models can be effectively extended to analyze continuous response time (RT) data in cognitive psychology.
    • This approach provides a unified framework for understanding cognitive processes by integrating accuracy and latency measures.
    • The methodology offers a robust tool for analyzing complex cognitive tasks with sequential processing stages.