Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Barriers to Effective Communication II

Barriers to Effective Communication II

The barriers to effective communication also include cultural barriers, semantic barriers, gender barriers, and time constraints.
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

Method of Sections: Problem Solving I

Method of Sections: Problem Solving I

Consider a symmetrical roof truss structure, composed of vertical, diagonal, and horizontal members. The length of each horizontal member is 4 m. The lengths of the vertical members FB and HD are 4 m, while the length of member GC is 6 m. The loads acting at joints F, G, and H are 2 kN, while those at joints A and E are 1 kN.

Method of Sections: Problem Solving II

Method of Sections: Problem Solving II

Consider an arbitrary truss structure composed of diagonal, vertical, and horizontal members fixed to the wall. To calculate the force acting on members CB, GB, and GH, method of sections can be used. The loads and lengths of the horizontal and vertical members are known parameters, as shown in the figure.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

International perspective on forensic mental health systems.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2001

Same author

Two steps forward and one step backward: the law and psychology movement(s) in the 20th century.

Law and human behavior·2000

Same author

The British Columbia Review Panel. Factors influencing decision-making.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2000

Same author

Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1999

Same author

Dangerous offender statutes in the United States and Canada. Implications for risk assessment.

International journal of law and psychiatry·1999

Same author

The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors' decisions in a murder trial: probative or prejudicial?

Law and human behavior·1997

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: a method and an example.

V G Rose¹, J R Ogloff

¹Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Law and Human Behavior

|August 15, 2001

Summary

Jury instruction comprehension can be tested using an application method. This study validated a simple technique for assessing legal instruction clarity with Canadian participants.

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Legal Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Research Methodology

Background:

Jury simulation research faces methodological challenges including sampling, stimulus materials, and role-playing issues.
Despite these challenges, jury instruction comprehension remains a critical area for study.
Existing methods for assessing comprehension may be complex or costly.

Purpose of the Study:

To validate a simple, inexpensive technique for testing the comprehensibility of jury instructions.
To address methodological concerns in jury simulation research.
To assess the clarity of Canadian legal instructions on criminal conspiracy and the coconspirator exception to the hearsay rule.

Main Methods:

Conducted 5 experiments using typical Canadian legal instructions.
Developed and validated an "application test" requiring participants to apply instructions to factual scenarios.
Utilized undergraduate students as participants, individual assessments without group deliberation, and written stimulus materials.

Main Results:

The application test proved to be a useful method for assessing jury instruction comprehensibility.
The study demonstrated the utility of this simple and inexpensive technique.
Results suggest undergraduate students and written materials are suitable for this type of research.

Conclusions:

The application test is a viable and cost-effective tool for evaluating jury instruction clarity.
Methodological concerns in jury simulation can be managed for specific research questions.
This technique offers a practical approach to improving legal communication in the courtroom.