Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
Structural alignment facilitates the noticing of differences
1Psychology Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60608, USA. gentner@northwestern.edu
Comparing similar concepts highlights both their commonalities and related differences. This study shows that the comparison process itself makes differences more noticeable, supporting structural alignment theory.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Psychology
Background:
- High-similarity concept pairs often reveal numerous commonalities and related differences.
- Previous research suggested this difference advantage supports structural alignment theory.
- Alternative explanations proposed that stored differences, not the comparison process, might cause this effect.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the comparison process itself enhances the psychological availability of differences.
- To determine if the difference advantage is a direct result of comparison or other factors.
- To test the structural alignment claim that comparison fosters noticing both commonalities and differences.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments were conducted where participants listed commonalities and differences for word pairs.
- Time pressure was applied during difference listing for previously compared (old) and new pairs.
- Experiment 2 involved mere coprocessing (thematic relations) instead of direct comparison.
- Experiment 3 manipulated the depth of common systems within concept pairs.
Main Results:
- Participants listed significantly more differences for old pairs than for new pairs, indicating comparison facilitates difference detection.
- The advantage in listing differences was specific to the comparison process; mere coprocessing did not yield the same benefit and could inhibit it.
- Pairs with deeper commonalities elicited a greater number of specific, alignable differences.
Conclusions:
- The findings support the structural alignment theory.
- The comparison process actively promotes the noticing of both commonalities and related differences.
- Psychological availability of differences is enhanced by the act of comparison itself.
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

