Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structure mapping in the comparison process.

A B Markman1, D Gentner

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Mezes Hall 330, Austin, TX 78712, USA. markman@psy.utexas.edu

The American Journal of Psychology
|December 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural alignment in similarity and difference judgments.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Comparison and choice: Relations between similarity processes and decision processes.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2001
Same author

Structural alignment facilitates the noticing of differences.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

Thinking.

Annual review of psychology·2001
Same author

Inference using categories.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same journal

Attributing social meaning to animated shapes: A new experimental study of apparent behavior.

The American journal of psychology·2021
Same journal

Scientific Study of Magic: Binet's Pioneering Approach Based on Observations and Chronophotography.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

Child and Ancient Man: How to Define Their Commonalities and Differences.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

Adolescent Aggression as Predicted from Parent-Child Relationships and Executive Functions.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

The Effect of Collective Transitions on the Organization and Contents of Autobiographical Memory: A Transition Theory Perspective.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

The Development and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Compound Remote Associates Test.

The American journal of psychology·2018
See all related articles

Structure-mapping theory explains similarity and analogy by aligning structured representations. This process favors connected relational structures and semantic similarity, crucial for cognitive functions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Similarity and analogy are fundamental cognitive processes.
  • Structure-mapping theory provides a computational framework for understanding comparison.
  • Key aspects of this theory remain subjects of debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine three central, yet controversial, tenets of structure-mapping theory.
  • To review evidence supporting these tenets.
  • To discuss challenges and implications for cognitive processes.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on three core principles of structure-mapping theory.
  • Review of empirical and theoretical evidence.
  • Analysis of challenges and counterarguments from researchers.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Comparison relies on structured representations.
  • The mapping process prioritizes connected relational structures.
  • Semantic similarity in relations drives cross-domain mapping.

Conclusions:

  • The reviewed evidence supports the core principles of structure-mapping theory.
  • Acknowledging challenges refines our understanding of analogical reasoning.
  • Structure mapping plays a vital role in broader cognitive functions.