Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Defining learning disability: what place does intelligence testing have now?

G O'Brien1

  • 1Northgate Hospital, Morpeth, Northumberland, UK.

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
|August 18, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Salivary Gene Expression Changes after Total Body Irradiation in Leukemia Patients: Toward Non-invasive Biodosimetry.

Radiation research·2026
Same author

Mechano-immunomodulation of macrophages influences the regenerative environment of fracture healing through the regulation of angiogenesis and osteogenesis.

Acta biomaterialia·2025
Same author

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: Inter-Assay Comparison of Eight Dosimetry Assays.

Radiation research·2023
Same author

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Gene Expression Assay.

Radiation research·2023
Same author

Inter-laboratory comparison of gene expression biodosimetry for protracted radiation exposures as part of the RENEB and EURADOS WG10 2019 exercise.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Gene Expression Changes in Irradiated Baboons: A Summary and Interpretation of a Decade of Findings.

Radiation research·2021
Same journal

Predictive ability of the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination for identifying severe neurodevelopmental impairment in infants born very preterm.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

Neuropathic pain in cerebral palsy and related genetic conditions: A scoping review of prevalence, characteristics, and management.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination global scores for predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes after 2 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

Seizure worsening and sodium channel blockers in HCN1-related epilepsies: A case series.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

What is the impact of childhood-onset disability research - and what should it be?

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

Sleep disturbances in children with cerebral palsy, their siblings, and parents: A qualitative descriptive study.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
See all related articles

Defining learning disability in children requires careful consideration of intelligence testing and early developmental onset. Social functioning assessments are also crucial, but no single measure is sufficient for accurate diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Child Psychology
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Accurate identification of learning disability in children is complex.
  • Existing diagnostic approaches often lack comprehensive consideration of multiple factors.
  • Variations in clinical practice and documentation, influenced by factors like population migration, complicate diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the need for a nuanced approach to defining learning disability in children.
  • To highlight the limitations of relying on single assessment methods.
  • To advocate for a multi-faceted diagnostic framework.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current practices in assessing learning disability.
  • Discussion of the role and limitations of intelligence testing (psychometric procedures).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on the necessity of evaluating early onset and social functioning (e.g., Vineland assessment).

    • Main Results:

    • Intelligence testing is valuable but insufficient on its own for defining learning disability.
    • Evidence of early onset during the developmental period is critical.
    • Assessment of social functioning provides additional, but not sole, diagnostic information.

    Conclusions:

    • A robust definition of learning disability requires integrating intelligence, early onset evidence, and social functioning assessments.
    • Contextual factors and environmental influences must be considered alongside test results.
    • Operationalized definitions are vital for accurate identification and appropriate support for children with learning disabilities.