Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mental health management in the context of TB care in the WHO European Region: a consensus statement.

IJTLD open·2026
Same author

Electron paramagnetic resonance dose measurements in teeth of tissue donors to the United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2023
Same author

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Assay.

Radiation research·2023
Same author

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Dicentric Chromosome Assay.

Radiation research·2023
Same author

The value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and stress echocardiography in the prediction of all-cause mortality in adults with end-stage renal disease.

European journal of sport science·2023
Same author

Effect of alkalinization and ultra-high-pressure homogenization on casein micelles in raw and pasteurized skim milk.

Journal of dairy science·2022
Same journal

Chromosomal Instability: A Potential Biomarker of Radiation Response.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Antioxidant Probucol Reduces Mortality in Mice Exposed to Lethal Doses of Ionizing Radiation.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

The Detection of Radiation Effects in the Urine of Rhesus Macaques Using Raman Spectroscopy.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Characterization of Radiation-responsive Genes and Transcript Variants under Different Radiation Qualities, Doses and Dose Rates.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Methyl Quercetin Inhibits Radiation-induced Senescence and TGF-β1-induced Myofibroblast Differentiation Through Psmad3/TGF-Β Signaling.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Characterization of the Sequence of Cytopenia after Total-body Irradiation using Unsupervised Machine Learning.

Radiation research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
07:08

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

7.4K

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: Inter-Assay Comparison of Eight Dosimetry Assays.

M Port1, J-F Barquinero2, D Endesfelder3

  • 1Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany.

Radiation Research
|June 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study validated biological and physical dosimetry assays for radiation exposure reconstruction in radiological incidents. Most assays accurately identified unexposed and highly exposed individuals, but some showed outliers and shifts in dose estimates.

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.3K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
07:08

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

7.4K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.3K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Radiation dosimetry and biodosimetry
  • Medical management of radiation exposure
  • Inter-laboratory comparisons

Background:

  • Accurate radiation dose estimation is critical for managing victims of radiological or nuclear incidents.
  • Biological and physical dosimetry assays are used to reconstruct radiation exposure.
  • Regular validation through inter-laboratory comparisons (ILCs) ensures the quality and reliability of these assays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of various cytogenetic, molecular, and physical dosimetry assays in an inter-laboratory comparison (ILC) setting.
  • To assess the accuracy of dose estimations for identifying clinically relevant exposure groups.
  • To identify potential research needs and technical challenges in radiation dose reconstruction.

Main Methods:

  • Three blinded samples (blood, enamel, mobile) were exposed to reference X-ray doses (0, 1.2, 3.5 Gy).
  • 86 specialized teams from 46 organizations across 27 nations participated, using assays like DCA, CBMN, FISH, PCC, gH2AX, GE, EPR, and LUM.
  • Dose estimates were analyzed based on categorization into clinically relevant groups, triage uncertainty intervals, and absolute differences from reference doses.

Main Results:

  • Most assays successfully categorized unexposed and highly exposed individuals.
  • Classification accuracy for the 1.2 Gy (moderately exposed) group was challenging, with significant misclassifications.
  • While generally effective, some assays exhibited systematic dose estimate shifts or extreme outliers, linked to sample material, team experience, or methodology.

Conclusions:

  • The RENEB ILC demonstrated that most tested assays are applicable for identifying unexposed and highly exposed individuals and relevant medical groups.
  • Challenges remain in accurately classifying moderately exposed individuals and addressing assay-specific outliers and systematic biases.
  • Regular ILCs are essential for identifying research needs, optimizing assay performance, and improving future radiation dose reconstruction strategies.