Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent?

J Levy1, H Pashler

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego 92093, USA. jlevy@tx.technion.ac.il

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|August 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divided attention: Storing and classifying briefly presented objects.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.

Consciousness and cognition·2001
Same author

Perception and production of brief durations: beat-based versus interval-based timing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

Attention and performance.

Annual review of psychology·2001
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Dual-task slowing, the slowdown when performing two tasks, can be eliminated by assigning equal priority. However, this study found task-specific features, not just priority, are crucial for eliminating dual-task interference.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Performing two tasks simultaneously often leads to dual-task slowing.
  • Previous research suggested equal task priority could eliminate this slowing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether equal task priority consistently eliminates dual-task slowing.
  • To identify factors influencing dual-task interference.

Main Methods:

  • Replicated a prior study using visual-manual and auditory-vocal tasks with equal priority.
  • Modified task pairings (visual-vocal, auditory-manual) while maintaining equal priority.
  • Tested single-stimulus conditions with equal priority instructions.

Main Results:

  • Experiment 1 confirmed previous findings of no slowing with specific task pairings and equal priority.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated significant dual-task slowing even with equal priority, especially with altered task pairings or single stimuli.
  • Task-specific features, not solely priority, appear critical for eliminating interference.

    • Conclusions:

    • Equalizing task priority is insufficient to eliminate dual-task interference across all task combinations.
    • The elimination of dual-task slowing is dependent on specific task characteristics and their interactions.