Related Experiment Videos
Out-of-hospital defibrillation with automated external defibrillators: postshock analysis should be delayed
1Emergency Department, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. mbi3@musica.mcgill.ca
Annals of Emergency Medicine
|August 29, 2001
Summary
Current automated external defibrillator (AED) protocols may miss recurrent ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (VF/VT). Delaying rhythm analysis after defibrillation improves detection rates for this critical cardiac event.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- American Heart Association guidelines recommend immediate rhythm analysis after automated external defibrillator (AED) shocks.
- Post-shock electrical silence or organized activity can precede recurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT).
- The optimal timing for identifying recurrent VF/VT after defibrillation is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the time to recurrence of VF/VT after a defibrillation attempt using an AED.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of current AED protocols in identifying recurrent life-threatening arrhythmias.
Main Methods:
- Screened 222 AED tapes from 96 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest over 18 months.
- Excluded pediatric and traumatic cases from a single emergency medical services system.
- Measured time from defibrillation to recurrent VF/VT by blinded cardiology fellows.
Main Results:
- Only 20% of VF/VT recurrences were identified within 6 seconds.
- 73% of VF/VT recurrences occurred by 60 seconds, and 90% by 90 seconds post-defibrillation.
- Eighty percent of VF/VT recurrences were missed by immediate analysis.
Conclusions:
- Current AED protocols miss a significant percentage of recurrent VF/VT.
- Postponing rhythm analysis to at least 30 seconds after defibrillation is recommended.
- Incorporating 30 seconds of chest compressions before AED analysis could increase VF/VT identification to 52%.