Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy As a Chronic Heart Failure Model in Swine
Published on: February 17, 2018
[Clinical trials on heart failure]
J Cosín Aguilar1, A Hernándiz Martínez
1Centro Investigación, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Insights
Heart failure treatment has advanced with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and beta-blockers proven to reduce mortality. While some drugs improve quality of life, evidence supports specific medications for chronic heart failure management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The Consensus study (1987) established enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), as effective in modifying heart failure and reducing mortality.
- Subsequent studies confirmed ACEI efficacy across various heart failure degrees, left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial infarction, and in diabetic patients.
- Beta-blockers (carvedilol, bisoprolol, metoprolol) demonstrated effectiveness in reducing deaths from progressive heart impairment and sudden death in chronic heart failure (1996).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence supporting current pharmacological treatments for chronic heart failure based on multicenter trials.
- To highlight the impact of specific drug classes, including ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and spironolactone, on heart failure prognosis.
- To discuss limitations of clinical trials, such as patient selection and trial design, and their impact on treatment adoption.
Main Methods:
- Review of landmark multicenter clinical trials, including the Consensus study, RALES, CIBIS, MCD, and ELITE.
- Analysis of drug efficacy data for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, spironolactone, digitalis, and amiodarone.
- Evaluation of the translation of trial findings into clinical practice and patient management.
Main Results:
- ACE inhibitors and specific beta-blockers significantly reduce mortality in chronic heart failure.
- Spironolactone (low doses) improves prognosis, while digitalis enhances quality of life but not survival.
- Amiodarone is the only antiarrhythmic shown to reduce sudden cardiac death.
- Multicenter trials provide crucial evidence, but often exclude specific populations (women, elderly, severe cases) and can suffer from design or interpretation flaws.
- Knowledge from trials is slow to reach patients, leading to underutilization of effective therapies like beta-blockers at recommended doses.
Conclusions:
- Evidence from multicenter trials supports the use of ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and spironolactone for managing chronic heart failure.
- Limitations in trial design and patient inclusion, along with slow knowledge dissemination, hinder optimal treatment of heart failure patients.
- Further research and improved strategies are needed to ensure effective heart failure therapies reach all appropriate patient groups.
Abstract:
n 1987 the results of the Consensus study were published, and showed that enalapril, an angiotensin convertor enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), was able to modify the clinical course of the heart failure syndrome thereby reducing mortality. Other ACEI later demonstrated the same effect on the different degrees of symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial infarction and more recently in diabetic patients. In 1996 studies on the betablockers carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol showed their efficacy in reducing deaths due to progressive heart impairment and sudden death in chronic heart failure. The RALES study showed that small doses of spironolactone also improved the prognosis on this disease. Digital improves the quality of life but not the survival rate. Only amiodarone (among the antiarrhythmics) reduces sudden death. Other drugs and groups of drugs can not be considered for chronic outpatient treatment of heart failure. Multicenter trials make it possible to obtain scientific evidence for establishing rational treatments. Many groups of patients such as women, elderly people and the more severe cases of the disease are often not included in these trials. Occasionally, multicenter trials are badly designed (CIBIS and MCD), which in the case of betablockers, led to a substantial delay in their administration. Other times, as in the ELITE study, the results were badly interpreted. The knowledge obtained from these studies is slow in reaching patients, with few patients taking betablockers. It is known that most patients do not take the doses found to be effective in multicenter trials.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

