Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cockpit management attitudes.

R L Helmreich1

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, USA.

Human Factors
|October 1, 1984
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Personality traits are stable, while attitudes can change. Understanding these differences is key for improving airline pilot performance in crew coordination and cockpit resource management.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Teaching teamwork during the Neonatal Resuscitation Program: a randomized trial.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2007
Same author

Teamwork and quality during neonatal care in the delivery room.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2006
Same author

[All memory is in the present. Hans-Gerhard Shäfer (18.12.1951-05.07.1995)].

Der Anaesthesist·2005
Same author

Translating teamwork behaviours from aviation to healthcare: development of behavioural markers for neonatal resuscitation.

Quality & safety in health care·2004
Same author

Analyzing cockpit communications: the links between language, performance, error, and workload.

Human performance in extreme environments : the journal of the Society for Human Performance in Extreme Environments·2002
Same author

The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation.

The International journal of aviation psychology·2001
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Towards Safe and Comfortable Vehicle Control Transitions: A Systematic Review of Takeover Time, Time Budget, and Takeover Outcomes.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

What's in a Name? Implications of AI Roles and Mind Perception for Human-AI Teams.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Safety Climate and Safety Behavior and Outcomes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review in Healthcare From the Perspective of Staff and Patients.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Aviation Psychology
  • Human Factors in Aviation
  • Organizational Behavior

Background:

  • Distinguishing between stable personality traits and malleable attitudes is crucial for understanding human behavior in complex environments.
  • Pilot performance, particularly in crew coordination and cockpit resource management, is influenced by psychological factors.
  • Effective crew resource management (CRM) requires an understanding of how attitudes impact pilot decision-making and teamwork.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between personality traits and attitudes in the context of aviation.
  • To investigate the relationship between pilot attitudes and performance in crew coordination and cockpit resource management.
  • To provide empirical data on cockpit management attitudes and their implications for pilot training.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Administered a Cockpit Management Attitudes questionnaire to airline pilots.
  • Collected and analyzed empirical data from the pilot survey.
  • Examined the stability of personality traits versus the malleability of attitudes.

Main Results:

  • Attitudes, unlike stable personality traits, were found to be more amenable to change.
  • Data indicated a significant link between pilot attitudes and performance in crew coordination tasks.
  • Specific attitude patterns were identified that correlate with effective cockpit resource management.

Conclusions:

  • Pilot attitudes significantly impact crew coordination and cockpit resource management effectiveness.
  • Training programs should address the malleability of attitudes to enhance pilot performance.
  • Further research into attitude-based interventions can improve aviation safety and efficiency.