Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

A Protocol for Housing Mice in an Enriched Environment
Published on: June 8, 2015
Effects of housing density on mouse physiology and behavior in the NASA Animal Enclosure Module simulators
S Naidu1, C M Winget, J W Jenner
1Space Life Sciences Payloads Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
This study evaluated mouse health in simulated space habitats. Different housing densities in Animal Enclosure Module simulators (AEMS) did not cause significant stress compared to standard cages.
Area of Science:
- Space biology and physiology
- Animal welfare science
- Microgravity research
Background:
- The Animal Enclosure Module (AEM) is crucial for studying microgravity's effects on animal physiology and behavior during space flight.
- Understanding optimal housing conditions is essential for animal well-being in space missions.
- Previous research, including NASA workshops, has highlighted the need for standardized rodent cage sizing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the health and well-being of mice housed at varying densities within AEM simulators (AEMS).
- To establish a comprehensive stress assessment battery (SAB) for evaluating mouse health in simulated space environments.
- To determine if specific population densities in AEMS lead to stressful conditions for the animals.
Main Methods:
- Development and application of a stress assessment battery (SAB) including appearance, behavior, consumption, weight changes, organ weights, and blood/plasma analyses.
- Comparison of mice housed in AEM simulators (AEMS) at different densities against mice in standard vivarium shoebox cages (VSBC).
- Inclusion of physiological and histological measures such as plasma corticosterone, total protein, leukocyte counts, and gastric histology.
Main Results:
- The developed stress assessment battery (SAB) provided a comprehensive evaluation of mouse health and well-being.
- Initial findings suggest that varying housing densities within AEMS did not induce significant stress indicators compared to control VSBC.
- Detailed physiological and behavioral data were collected to establish baseline health parameters for future space flight studies.
Conclusions:
- The stress assessment battery (SAB) is a viable tool for monitoring animal health in simulated spaceflight environments.
- Current housing densities tested in AEM simulators (AEMS) appear to be well-tolerated by mice.
- Further research is warranted to fully understand the long-term effects of microgravity and varying densities on animal physiology and behavior.
More Related Videos
11:08Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform
Published on: January 13, 2019
14:24An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
Published on: July 29, 2025