Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimal reductions in CO2 emissions.

P A Schultz1, J F Kasting

  • 1Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.

Energy Policy
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison between ozone column depths and methane lifetimes computed by one- and three-dimensional models at different atmospheric O<sub>2</sub> levels.

Royal Society open science·2023
Same author

Off-center Tl and Na dopant centers in CsI.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2013
Same author

Greenhouse warming by nitrous oxide and methane in the Proterozoic Eon.

Geobiology·2011
Same author

Evidence of a mycorrhizal mechanism for the adaptation of Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae) to high- and low-nutrient prairies.

American journal of botany·2011
Same author

Low pCO2 in the pore water, not in the Archean air.

Nature·2011
Same author

Variable responses of old-field perennials to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus source.

Oecologia·2005
Same journal

Estimated attribution of the RFS Program on soybean biodiesel in the U.S. using the Bioenergy Scenario Model.

Energy policy·2025
Same journal

Readiness for a clean energy future: Prevalence, perceptions, and barriers to adoption of electric stoves and solar panels in New York City.

Energy policy·2024
Same journal

Impacts of the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program on the economy of California.

Energy policy·2023
Same journal

The concern about main crises such as the Covid-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and climate change's impact on energy-saving behavior.

Energy policy·2023
Same journal

Expanding Ethanol Production in the United States: The Roles of Policy, Price, and Demand.

Energy policy·2023
Same journal

Post-pandemic lessons for EU energy and climate policy after the Russian invasion of Ukraine: Introduction to a special issue on EU green recovery in the post-Covid-19 period.

Energy policy·2023
See all related articles

Climate-economy models underestimate global warming damages due to simplified CO2 uptake. Realistic carbon cycle parameterization in the DICE model shows optimal CO2 emission reductions are highly sensitive to the discount rate, advocating for significant cuts.

Area of Science:

  • Climate Science
  • Environmental Economics
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Current climate-economy models inaccurately represent carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake, leading to underestimations of peak atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warming damages.
  • Existing models fail to capture the long-term effects of elevated CO2 levels, impacting the accuracy of climate change projections and economic damage assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a more realistic and practical carbon cycle parameterization for optimizing climate-economy models.
  • To re-evaluate optimal CO2 emission reduction strategies using an improved carbon cycle model integrated with the DICE framework.
  • To analyze the sensitivity of optimal emission reductions to the rate of time preference (rho).

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel, practical carbon cycle parameterization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Integrated this parameterization into the DICE (Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy) model.
  • Estimated optimal CO2 emission reductions under varying rates of time preference (rho).

    • Main Results:

    • The model's predictions for optimal CO2 emission reductions are highly sensitive to the rate of time preference (rho).
    • For a 3% discount rate (rho=3%), optimal emission reductions by 2045 are 13% (compared to 11% in the original DICE model).
    • For a 0% discount rate (rho=0%), optimal emission reductions increase significantly to 79% by 2045 and 97% by 2200.

    Conclusions:

    • Energy policy decisions should prioritize the findings associated with a 0% discount rate due to economic and ethical considerations.
    • A steady-state analysis using the DICE model supports the necessity of substantial fractional reductions in CO2 emissions.
    • Implementing a more realistic carbon cycle parameterization significantly alters the projected optimal pathways for mitigating climate change.