Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial
J Q Clemens1, T G Schuster, J W Konnak
1Department of Urology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Purpose:
We determined the actuarial revision rate for artificial urinary sphincters implanted in patients who were incontinent after radical prostatectomy.
Materials And Methods:
We reviewed the records of 70 consecutive patients who were incontinent after radical prostatectomy and who underwent primary artificial urinary sphincter implantation at the University of Michigan between 1984 and 1999. Questionnaires were mailed to all patients with an indwelling device, and telephone calls were placed to those who did not respond to the mailing. Information about surgical revision and current continence status was obtained from chart review and questionnaire response. The Kaplan-Meier curves for actuarial freedom from operative revision were constructed.
Results:
Of the 66 patients with available postoperative data 24 (36%) required reoperation at a mean followup of 41 months. The 5-year actuarial rate for freedom from any operative revision was 50%, and the corresponding rate for cuff revision was 60%. A single operative revision did not predispose the patient to further revision. Questionnaire data indicated a continence rate of 80% (range 0 to 2 pads).
Conclusions:
Approximately half of the patients who were incontinent after radical prostatectomy may expect to undergo operative revision within 5 years after artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Despite this high reoperation rate, an excellent level of continence is maintained.
