Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

Overview
Probability Distributions01:32

Probability Distributions

The probability of a random variable x  is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson probability...
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
Poisson Probability Distribution01:09

Poisson Probability Distribution

A Poisson probability distribution is a discrete probability distribution. It gives the probability of a number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time or space if these events happen at a known average rate and independently of the time since the last event. For example, a book editor might be interested in the number of words spelled incorrectly in a particular book. It might be that, on average, there are five words spelled incorrectly in 100 pages. The interval is 100 pages.
The...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Glaucoma outcome studies using existing databases: opportunities and limitations.

Journal of glaucoma·2009
Same author

Small-sample bias and corrections for conditional maximum-likelihood odds-ratio estimators.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects.

International journal of epidemiology·2002
Same author

Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2001
Same author

Data augmentation priors for Bayesian and semi-Bayes analyses of conditional-logistic and proportional-hazards regression.

Statistics in medicine·2001

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Putting background information about relative risks into conjugate prior distributions.

S Greenland1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, and Topanga, California 90290, USA.

Biometrics
|September 12, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study addresses challenges in Bayesian analysis of epidemiologic data, specifically when defining conjugate priors for relative risks. A novel data-augmentation approximation method is proposed to ensure accurate prior covariance structure, improving risk analysis.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Bayesian statistical modeling

Background:

  • Bayesian and empirical Bayes analyses commonly use multivariate normal or conjugate priors for relative risks.
  • Specifying conjugate priors from background information on relative risks presents implementation challenges.
  • Traditional methods using flattening constants can conflict with the true prior covariance structure of log relative risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe problems in translating background information into conjugate priors for relative risks.
  • To propose a solution for deriving conjugate priors consistent with the true prior covariance structure.
  • To illustrate the method with a logistic regression analysis of neonatal-death risk.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a data-augmentation approximation to the true log relative-risk prior.
  • Deriving a conjugate prior that is consistent with the true prior covariance structure.
  • Implementing a rescaling step to ensure the accuracy of the data-augmentation approximation.

Main Results:

  • The proposed data-augmentation approximation method allows for the derivation of conjugate priors that respect the true prior covariance structure.
  • A rescaling step is identified as necessary for maintaining the accuracy of this approximation.
  • The method is demonstrated to be effective in a logistic regression model for neonatal-death risk.

Conclusions:

  • A novel approach using data augmentation provides a more accurate method for specifying conjugate priors in Bayesian epidemiologic analyses.
  • This method overcomes the limitations of traditional flattening constants, ensuring better alignment with the underlying data structure.
  • Accurate prior specification is crucial for reliable inference in epidemiologic studies, particularly in risk assessment.