Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Small-sample bias and corrections for conditional maximum-likelihood odds-ratio estimators.

S Greenland1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|August 23, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Glaucoma outcome studies using existing databases: opportunities and limitations.

Journal of glaucoma·2009
Same author

On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects.

International journal of epidemiology·2002
Same author

Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2001
Same author

Putting background information about relative risks into conjugate prior distributions.

Biometrics·2001
Same author

Data augmentation priors for Bayesian and semi-Bayes analyses of conditional-logistic and proportional-hazards regression.

Statistics in medicine·2001
Same journal

A Bayesian functional concurrent zero-inflated Dirichlet-multinomial regression model with application to infant microbiome.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Towards optimal environmental policies: policy learning under arbitrary bipartite network interference.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Multilevel functional quantile principal component analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Adaptive transfer learning for time-to-event modeling with applications in disease risk assessment.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

High-dimensional test for one-sided hypotheses.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

NBSR: a Negative Binomial Softmax Regression model for microRNA-seq data analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Small-sample corrections for odds ratio estimation in matched pairs are evaluated. These methods, including Bayesian approaches, can diagnose small-sample issues, revealing potential bias in epidemiological studies.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Conditional maximum-likelihood estimation (CMLE) is used for odds ratio calculation in matched pair studies with dichotomous exposure.
  • Small sample sizes can introduce bias in odds ratio estimation.
  • Existing small-sample corrections for CMLE require evaluation for their generalizability and diagnostic utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To contrast the rationale and performance of various small-sample corrections for the odds ratio estimator in dichotomous exposure matched pairs.
  • To identify corrections that generalize effectively to multiple conditional logistic regression models.
  • To assess the utility of these corrections and Bayesian analyses as diagnostics for small-sample problems.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review and comparison of theoretical underpinnings of different small-sample correction methods for odds ratio estimation.
  • Evaluation of the performance of selected corrections through an exact performance comparison in a small sample setting.
  • Application of corrections and Bayesian analyses to a real-world epidemiological dataset (electrical wiring and childhood leukemia).

    • Main Results:

    • Several small-sample corrections for odds ratio estimation were analyzed.
    • The performance comparison indicated that small-sample bias in odds ratio estimation may be more common than previously assumed.
    • The utility of corrections and informative priors as diagnostic tools for small-sample bias was demonstrated.

    Conclusions:

    • Small-sample corrections are valuable for addressing bias in odds ratio estimation for matched pairs.
    • The evaluated corrections offer potential for diagnosing and mitigating small-sample issues in logistic regression.
    • Further investigation into these methods is warranted for robust epidemiological inference.