Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pursuit eye movements to second-order motion targets.

M J Hawken1, K R Gegenfurtner

  • 1Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York 10003, USA. mjh@cns.nyu.edu

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision
|September 12, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Smooth pursuit eye movements are impaired by second-order motion stimuli, especially at slower speeds. First-order motion provides more robust visual tracking for smooth pursuit.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What is the best fixation target? The effect of target shape on stability of fixational eye movements.

Vision research·2012
Same author

Smooth pursuit eye movements to isoluminant targets.

Journal of neurophysiology·2008
Same author

Loose-patch-juxtacellular recording in vivo--a method for functional characterization and labeling of neurons in macaque V1.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2006
Same author

Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant not dynamic.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2005
Same author

Suppression of neural responses to nonoptimal stimuli correlates with tuning selectivity in macaque V1.

Journal of neurophysiology·2002
Same author

Effects of visual illusions on grasping.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Smooth-pursuit eye movements are crucial for maintaining clear vision.
  • Distinguishing between first-order (luminance-defined) and second-order (contrast-defined) motion is fundamental to visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of first- and second-order motion stimuli on smooth-pursuit eye movements.
  • To compare the efficacy of different motion cues in eliciting accurate eye tracking.
  • To examine the interaction between first- and second-order motion cues.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized random dot fields modulated by Gaussian windows to create first- and second-order motion stimuli.
  • Presented stimuli at slow (1°/s) and moderate (6°/s) target speeds.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured initiation, transition, and steady-state phases of smooth-pursuit eye movements.

    • Main Results:

    • Second-order motion stimuli significantly impaired smooth pursuit initiation, transition, and steady-state phases at 1°/s compared to first-order stimuli.
    • At 6°/s, a small but significant deficit in steady-state pursuit of second-order motion was observed, with minimal impact on initiation.
    • Combined motion cues were used to assess interactions, though specific interaction findings are not detailed in the abstract.

    Conclusions:

    • Second-order motion is less effective than first-order motion in driving smooth-pursuit eye movements, particularly at lower velocities.
    • The visual system's ability to track moving objects is differentially affected by the type of motion cue presented.
    • These findings have implications for understanding visual perception and developing assistive technologies.