Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interaction of first- and second-order direction in motion-defined motion.

J M Zanker1, N R Burns

  • 1Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, England. J.Zanker@rhul.ac.uk

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision
|September 12, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how the brain estimates motion direction for objects defined by motion, not just luminance. Findings suggest first- and second-order motion information are pooled, not processed independently, impacting motion perception.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The influence of motor function on processing speed in preterm and term-born children.

Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence·2015
Same author

Production and Purification of Hybrid Ty-VLPs.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2011
Same author

Screening for depression and anxiety in spinal cord injury with DASS-21.

Spinal cord·2007
Same author

Movement-induced motion signal distributions in outdoor scenes.

Network (Bristol, England)·2006
Same author

On temporal hyperacuity in the human visual system.

Vision research·2002
Same author

Speed tuning in elementary motion detectors of the correlation type.

Biological cybernetics·2002

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Motion processing
  • Computational neuroscience

Background:

  • Motion-defined objects require specialized processing beyond simple nonlinearities.
  • Understanding the link between object-surface motion and emergent object motion is crucial.
  • Previous research indicated some cooperativity between first- and second-order motion information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how motion direction is estimated for motion-defined objects.
  • To analyze the integration of first- and second-order motion cues in direction perception.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms of motion processing networks.

Main Methods:

  • Human observers reported perceived motion direction of objects defined by luminance contrast or random-dot kinematograms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli varied in the spatiotemporal properties of object region versus background.
  • Conditions included coherent object motion (Fourier motion) and static or diagonal dot motion within the object (drift-balanced and theta motion).

    • Main Results:

    • Direction sensitivity for Fourier motion matched luminance-defined objects.
    • Performance decreased with static dots (drift-balanced motion).
    • Accuracy further declined in theta motion, with perceived direction being an intermediate blend of object and dot motion, indicating velocity vector pooling.

    Conclusions:

    • First- and second-order directional information for motion-defined objects are not separable.
    • This suggests motion processing subsystems do not produce independent percepts.
    • Findings support a two-layer motion-processing network model where velocity vectors are pooled.