Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The why and the wherefore.

B R Catchlove1

  • 1Padua Consulting Pty Ltd, Health Services Consulting, Sydney, NSW. bcatchlo@bigpond.net.au

The Medical Journal of Australia
|September 15, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Corporatisation of general practice (GP) is increasing due to GPs' market power. While ethical corporatisation can enhance primary care, potential consequences include increased healthcare spending and de-skilling of GPs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paediatrics 1981: Canadian style.

World hospitals·1982
Same author

International perspectives.

Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association·1982
Same author

A new direction in hospital health promotion.

Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association·1981
Same author

Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians.

Journal of chronic diseases·1981
Same author

Routine investigations in elective surgical patients.

The Medical journal of Australia·1979
Same author

The real health issue--cost containment.

Australian hospital·1976
Same journal

Drivers of Vaccine Uptake for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children to Inform Tailored Strategies: A Qualitative Study Exploring Health Service Provider Perspective.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Four Urgent Actions for the Rights to Culturally Safe Breastfeeding for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mothers and Babies to Breastfeed in Neonatal Intensive Care Environments.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Intergenerational Child Protection Contact and Child Development Outcomes: A Whole Population Linked Data Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Treatment and Survival Outcomes for Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Australians Within the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Worsening Asthma Outcomes in Australian Adults: A Comparison of Stratified Sample Surveys in 2012 and 2021.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Stigmatising Attitudes Towards People With Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Borderline Personality, ADHD and Early and Long-Term/Untreated Schizophrenia: Representative Survey of Australian Adults.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Primary Care Policy
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • General Practitioners (GPs) hold significant market power influencing healthcare revenue through referrals and prescriptions.
  • The healthcare industry is shifting from a traditional model to a more commercialized structure.
  • Corporatisation of general practice is a growing trend within this evolving landscape.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the increasing trend of general practice corporatisation.
  • To identify the potential consequences of this corporatisation on healthcare spending, GP autonomy, and professional development.

Main Methods:

  • This study is a conceptual analysis based on the provided abstract.
  • It reviews the market dynamics and structural changes in the primary care sector.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It identifies potential impacts stemming from the corporatisation of general practices.

    • Main Results:

    • Corporatisation, if ethically managed, can lead to high-quality, efficient primary care delivery.
    • Potential negative consequences include increased overall healthcare expenditure.
    • Other risks involve limitations on GP practice choices, challenges in justifying fee increases, and potential de-skilling of GPs.

    Conclusions:

    • The corporatisation of general practice presents both opportunities for improved primary care and significant risks.
    • Careful ethical oversight and strategic planning are crucial to mitigate negative consequences.
    • Understanding these impacts is vital for policymakers and healthcare professionals navigating this transition.