Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts?

M Peumans1, B Van Meerbeek, K Asscherickx

  • 1BIOMAT-Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. marleen.peumans@skynet.be

Dental Materials : Official Publication of the Academy of Dental Materials
|September 25, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Randomized controlled trial comparing glass-fiber versus metal posts in single-crowned teeth: 15 Year follow-up.

Journal of dentistry·2025
Same author

Response to letter to editor: Clinical outcome of guided endodontics versus freehand drilling: A controlled clinical trial, single arm with external control group.

International endodontic journal·2024
Same author

Clinical outcome of guided endodontics versus freehand drilling: A controlled clinical trial, single arm with external control group.

International endodontic journal·2024
Same author

Coloring Multilayer Zirconia May Affect Its Optical and Mechanical Properties.

Journal of dental research·2024
Same author

Filler Mixed Into Adhesives Does Not Necessarily Improve Their Mechanical Properties.

Operative dentistry·2024
Same author

Influence of airborne particle abrasion on dentin bonding effectiveness of a 2-step universal adhesive.

Journal of dentistry·2024

Achieving strong proximal contacts in Class II resin composite restorations is crucial. A sectional matrix system, like Palodent, significantly improved contact quality compared to other matrix systems and packable composites.

Area of Science:

  • Restorative Dentistry
  • Dental Materials Science

Background:

  • Direct resin composite restorations in Class II preparations present challenges in achieving adequate contact areas with adjacent teeth.
  • Optimizing proximal contact quality is essential for preventing interproximal plaque accumulation and secondary caries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of different resin composite types (packable vs. conventional) and matrix systems on the quality of proximal contact areas in Class II composite restorations.
  • To compare the effectiveness of various matrix systems and a specialized hand instrument in achieving superior proximal contacts.

Main Methods:

  • Standardized Class II (DO) cavities were prepared in 170 artificial teeth.
  • Four resin composites and three matrix systems were tested, with and without a specialized contact former instrument.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proximal contact quality was assessed by measuring mesio-distal diameter and the tightness of the contact area using standardized blades.

    • Main Results:

    • The Palodent matrix system resulted in significantly larger mesio-distal diameters and stronger proximal contact areas.
    • The Belvedere Composite Contact Former, used with the Lucifix or Automatrix systems, also enhanced proximal contact strength.
    • No significant differences in contact quality were observed with different resin composites when using the Palodent system.

    Conclusions:

    • Sectional matrix systems are superior for achieving optimal proximal contact areas in Class II composite restorations.
    • The 'packability' of resin composites did not demonstrate a significant advantage in improving proximal contact quality.