Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preadolescent adjudicative competence: methodological considerations and recommendations for practice standards.

L B Oberlander1, N E Goldstein, C N Ho

  • 1Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.

Behavioral Sciences & the Law
|September 25, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lack of effect of benralizumab on signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from the phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled HILLIER trial.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2023
Same author

DC current pulses for OTSC clip fragmentation: technology and experimental study.

Surgical endoscopy·2014
Same author

Wireless therapeutic endoscopic capsule: in vivo experiment.

Endoscopy·2008
Same author

[Actuator design and control exemplified by a urologic implant].

Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering·2002
Same author

A review and update on the practice of evaluating Miranda comprehension.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2001
Same author

Psycholegal issues in child sexual abuse evaluations: a survey of forensic mental health professionals.

Child abuse & neglect·1995
Same journal

Increasing the Incentive to Serve: The Effects of a Juror Pay Increase in Texas.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

Beyond the Adversarial Rivalry: A Developmental Rights-Based Model for Minor-on-Minor Crime, Part 2.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

Current State of Psychological Research on Intimate Partner Violence: Implications for Legal Proceedings.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

A Narrative Review on Juvenile Offense and the Impact and Implications of Internalizing Disorders.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

Behavioral and Cognitive Equivalence Threshold: Foundations for the Practical Extension of Atkins and Roper.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

The Adverse Childhood Experiences Paradigm and Forensic/Correctional Populations: A Scoping Review.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
See all related articles

Forensic evaluation standards need updating for preadolescent defendants, as current guidelines for older individuals do not adequately address the unique legal and developmental needs of young children facing competence evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Legal Psychology

Background:

  • Existing forensic evaluation standards are primarily designed for adolescents and adults.
  • These standards lack sufficient applicability to preadolescent defendants due to unique legal parameters affecting young children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine developmental and legal issues concerning the downward age extension of forensic evaluation practice standards.
  • To address the need for updated standards for evaluating the competence of preadolescent defendants.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing research and practice standards.
  • Analysis of legal parameters affecting young children in competence evaluations.
  • Examination of competence abilities within a developmental framework.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Current standards are inadequate for preadolescent competence evaluations.
  • Legal concepts like "immaturity" and "parens patriae" require specific consideration for young children.
  • Recent shifts in juvenile justice emphasize adversarial approaches over rehabilitation.

Conclusions:

  • There is a critical need to adapt forensic evaluation standards for preadolescent defendants.
  • Developmental considerations are paramount when assessing adjudicative competence in young children.
  • Updated guidelines are necessary to ensure accurate and appropriate evaluations in juvenile court.