Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2026

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
Published on: October 21, 2022
Corneal thickness measurements with contact and noncontact specular microscopic and ultrasonic pachymetry
L Módis1, A Langenbucher, B Seitz
1Department of Ophthalmology, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, H-4012 Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt 98, Hungary. lmodis@dragon.kite.hu
Purpose:
To evaluate the central corneal thickness values in normal and postkeratoplasty corneas with the new Topcon SP-2000P noncontact specular microscopic, contact specular microscopic, and the "common standard" ultrasonic pachymetry.
Methods:
Central corneal thickness was determined in 119 eyes of 81 patients (73 normal eyes of 44 patients and 46 eyes after penetrating keratoplasty) first with a noncontact specular microscopic (Topcon SP-2000P; Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), then an ultrasonic (AL-1000; Tomey, Erlangen, Germany), and finally with a contact specular microscopic (EM-1000; Tomey, Erlangen, Germany) pachymetry two times each by the same investigator.
Results:
Reliability of the central corneal measurements was equally high both in normal and in postkeratoplasty corneas with all of the instruments (Cronbach alpha = 0.99). Noncontact specular microscopic corneal thickness determination correlated significantly both with ultrasonic (r =.86, P <.0001) and contact specular microscopic pachymetry (r =.62, P <.0001). The ultrasonic pachymetry correlated well with the Tomey pachymetry (r =.69, P <.0001). The Topcon normal mean central corneal thickness value (542 +/- 46 microm) was 28 +/- 4 microm lower (P <.0001) compared with the ultrasonic data (570 +/- 42 microm), which was 68 +/- 1 microm lower (P <.0001) compared with Tomey thickness (638 +/- 43 microm).
Conclusions:
Central corneal thickness measurements with noncontact specular microscopic, contact specular microscopic, and ultrasonic pachymetry demonstrate that each of the instruments is reliable but cannot be simply used interchangeably.
