Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Anatomical Reconstructions of the Human Cardiac Venous System using Contrast-computed Tomography of Perfusion-fixed Specimens
Published on: April 18, 2013
Is deconvolution applicable to renography?
J D Kuyvenhoven1, H Ham, A Piepsz
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, E02.222, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands. J.D.C.S.Kuyvenhoven@rrn.azu.nl
Abstract:
The feasibility of deconvolution depends on many factors, but the technique cannot provide accurate results if the maximal transit time (MaxTT) is longer than the duration of the acquisition. This study evaluated whether, on the basis of a 20 min renogram, it is possible to predict in which cases the MaxTT will exceed 20 min. Renograms of various shapes were simulated by convolution of a plasma disappearance curve and various created retention functions with a mean transit time (MTT) ranging from 3 to 23 min. The values of MaxTT were then derived from the created curves and compared to three parameters of transit measured on the renograms: the time to reach the maximum of the curve (Tmax), the output efficiency at 20 min (OE20), and the normalized residual activity at 20 min (NORA20). The proportion of retention functions (n=390) with MaxTT>20 min increased with increasing Tmax (e.g. 9% for 6< or =Tmax<10 min, and 34% for 11< or =Tmax<15 min), increasing NORA20 (e.g. 20% for 1.4< or =NORA20<3.0, and 84% for 3.0< or =NORA20<5.0) and decreasing OE20 (19% for 50%
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging

