Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Moniz, lobotomy and the Nobel Price 1949].

C M Stolt

    Svensk Medicinhistorisk Tidskrift
    |October 20, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary

    The 1949 Nobel Prize awarded to Egas Moniz for prefrontal leucotomy was influenced by increased global experience with the procedure, despite earlier criticisms of its methodology and patient selection.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Poetry, interpretation and unpredictability: a reply to Neil Pickering.

    Medical humanities·2013
    Same author

    [Poul Bjerre's practice of psychiatry].

    Svensk medicinhistorisk tidskrift·2002
    Same author

    [Physician and medicine in the post-modern society].

    Lakartidningen·2002
    Same author

    [John Bjorkhem and hypnosis].

    Svensk medicinhistorisk tidskrift·2002
    Same author

    [Health care is a project of morals!].

    Lakartidningen·2001
    Same author

    [Evidence-based medicine: ten critical objections against a valuable method].

    Lakartidningen·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Neurology
    • Neurosurgery
    • Medical History

    Background:

    • Egas Moniz pioneered prefrontal leucotomy in 1936, a controversial psychosurgical technique.
    • Moniz also made significant contributions to medicine with his development of cerebral angiography.

    Discussion:

    • Herbert Olivecrona initially omitted leucotomy from his assessment of Moniz's work in 1937.
    • Critical comments regarding Moniz's leucotomy, citing short follow-up and undefined patient groups, were raised in 1944.

    Key Insights:

    • Olivecrona's 1949 review supported Moniz for the Nobel Prize, a shift from his earlier stance.
    • The increased worldwide experience with prefrontal leucotomy was a key factor in the 1949 Nobel decision.

    Outlook:

    • The decision to award Moniz the Nobel Prize did not address the ethical and philosophical implications of leucotomy.
    • Further analysis is needed to understand the long-term impact and ethical considerations of early psychosurgery.

    Related Experiment Videos