Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The preembryo as potential: a reply to John A. Robertson.

Richard A McCormick

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |December 1, 1991
    PubMed
    Summary

    Reasonable individuals may differ on preembryo research ethics, but providing justifications is crucial. Many ethical bodies lack clear reasoning for their conclusions on embryo freezing and research.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Autonomy and Coercion: Moral Values in Medical Practice.

    The Linacre quarterly·2022
    Same author

    Clinical characteristics of individuals with serious mental illness and type 2 diabetes.

    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2015
    Same author

    Communicating about alcohol consumption to nonharmful drinkers with Hepatitis C: patient and provider perspectives.

    Journal of general internal medicine·2011
    Same author

    Alcohol Consumption Decisions among Nonabusing Drinkers Diagnosed with Hepatitis C: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.

    Journal of mixed methods research·2010
    Same author

    Lay management of chronic disease: a qualitative study of living with hepatitis C infection.

    American journal of health behavior·2009
    Same author

    Communicating about alcohol consumption to nonharmful drinkers with hepatitis C: patient and provider perspectives.

    Journal of general internal medicine·2008

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Embryology

    Background:

    • Ethical considerations surrounding human preembryo research are complex and debated.
    • Existing guidelines and conclusions from various bodies often lack explicit justification.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the reasoning behind ethical conclusions on preembryo research.
    • To evaluate the adequacy of justifications provided for differing stances on preembryo freezing, discard, and diagnosis.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical analysis of ethical arguments presented by key figures like John Robertson.
    • Examination of reports from ethical committees, such as the Warnock Committee.

    Main Results:

    • While consensus exists on the acceptability of preembryo research by many bodies, the reasoning is often unstated.
    • John Robertson's justifications for permissive positions on preembryo research are found to be analytically fragile.

    Conclusions:

    • Disagreement on preembryo research conclusions is acceptable among reasonable persons.
    • The requirement for clear, reasoned justifications for ethical stances on preembryo handling is paramount.
    • A totally prohibitive stance is not necessarily the only defensible position.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos