Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decisionmaking competence and risk.

Dan W Brock

    Bioethics
    |April 1, 1991
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study addresses criticisms of a risk-related standard for assessing patient competence in healthcare decision-making. It defends a balanced approach, considering patient well-being and self-determination against potential risks.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

    JAMA·2016
    Same author

    Good medical ethics.

    Journal of medical ethics·2014
    Same author

    Making treatment decisions for oneself: weighing the value.

    The Hastings Center report·2014
    Same author

    Reflections on the patient preference predictor proposal.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2014
    Same author

    Deactivation of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

    Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2012
    Same author

    Prioritizing registered donors in organ allocation: an ethical appraisal of the Israeli organ transplant law.

    Current opinion in critical care·2012
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Medical Ethics
    • Philosophy of Medicine

    Background:

    • Determining patient competence for healthcare decisions is complex.
    • A risk-related standard balances patient self-determination with well-being.
    • Mark Wicclair critiques this risk-related standard.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To respond to Mark Wicclair's criticisms of a risk-related standard for healthcare decision-making competence.
    • To defend the proposed standard against arguments that it leads to faulty determinations.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of ethical arguments regarding patient competence.
    • Critique of Wicclair's objections to a risk-related standard.
    • Philosophical examination of balancing self-determination and well-being.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachPhilosophical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Wicclair's criticisms are addressed, focusing on the justification and application of a risk-related standard.
    • The study evaluates arguments concerning the potential for inaccurate competence assessments.

    Conclusions:

    • The paper aims to demonstrate the validity of a risk-related standard for assessing patient competence.
    • It seeks to refute criticisms and support the standard's role in ethical healthcare decision-making.