Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Altruistic surrogacy and informed consent.

Justin Oakley

    Bioethics
    |October 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Accommodating plural values in healthcare and healthcare policy.

    Monash bioethics review·2025
    Same author

    Misaligned hope and conviction in health care.

    Bioethics·2024
    Same author

    Where There's Hope, There's Life 1 : On the Importance of Hope in Health Care.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2024
    Same author

    Should the Use of Adaptive Machine Learning Systems in Medicine be Classified as Research?

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024
    Same author

    Expanding choice at the end of life.

    Journal of medical ethics·2023
    Same author

    Religious pluralism in healthcare.

    Bioethics·2022
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Informed consent for surrogacy does not require predicting future emotions. Arguments against surrogate motherhood based on unknowable emotional responses are flawed, as informed consent doesn't demand such foresight.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Philosophy of Law
    • Reproductive Ethics

    Background:

    • Arguments against surrogate motherhood often cite a woman's inability to give informed consent due to unpredictable emotional responses to pregnancy and relinquishment.
    • This premise is frequently linked to moral principles limiting the exercise of autonomy on behalf of others, deeming surrogacy impermissible.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To challenge the non sequitur in arguments against surrogate motherhood that hinge on the impossibility of informed consent due to unknowable future emotional states.
    • To demonstrate that the inability to predict future emotions does not invalidate the moral permissibility of surrogacy.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical argumentation and conceptual analysis.
    • Examination of the requirements for informed consent in analogous situations with uncertain outcomes.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachGenetics and ReproductionProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the relationship between informed consent and autonomous decision-making.

    • Main Results:

    • The claim that women cannot autonomously consent to surrogacy because they cannot foresee their emotional responses is a flawed premise.
    • Informed consent, in various significant contexts, does not necessitate prescience of future emotional states.
    • The moral permissibility of surrogacy is not undermined by the inherent uncertainty of emotional responses.

    Conclusions:

    • Arguments against surrogate motherhood based on the impossibility of informed consent due to unknowable emotional responses are logically unsound.
    • The concept of informed consent is broader than the ability to predict future feelings, encompassing rational decision-making under conditions of uncertainty.
    • Clarification of the relationship between informed consent and autonomy in decision-making processes, particularly in complex reproductive arrangements.