Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Opposing views on animal experimentation: do animals have rights?

Tom L Beauchamp

    Ethics & Behavior
    |January 1, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Robert Veatch's early career in bioethics, contributions to the field, and career at Georgetown University.

    Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2022
    Same author

    Common Morality Principles in Biomedical Ethics: Responses to Critics.

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2021
    Same author

    The Origins and Drafting of the <i>Belmont Report</i>.

    Perspectives in biology and medicine·2021
    Same author

    On Conditions that Compromise Autonomous Choice.

    The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2020
    Same author

    Lucky Me: The Amiable and Weighty Influences on My Career.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2020
    Same author

    Response to Commentaries.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2020
    Same journal

    Incidental Genetic Findings Discovered During Autopsy: An Ethical Analysis of Patient Confidentiality Post-Mortem.

    Ethics & behavior·2025
    Same journal

    Ethical considerations for the use of ecological momentary assessment in non-suicidal self-injury research.

    Ethics & behavior·2025
    Same journal

    Addressing Fraudulent Responses in Quantitative and Qualitative Internet Research: Case Studies from Body Image and Appearance Research.

    Ethics & behavior·2025
    Same journal

    Research ethics education needs assessment in Serbian medical researchers.

    Ethics & behavior·2025
    Same journal

    Aligning values with standards: a comparison of professional values in Continuing Education standards.

    Ethics & behavior·2024
    Same journal

    Implementation of a Risk Reduction Protocol in Youth Violence Research.

    Ethics & behavior·2024
    See all related articles

    Animals possess moral standing due to their capacity to feel pain, establishing that humans have moral obligations towards them. Consequently, animals are recognized as having rights, which are intrinsically linked to these obligations.

    Area of Science:

    • Animal ethics
    • Moral philosophy
    • Animal rights theory

    Background:

    • The concept of moral standing is central to ethical considerations.
    • Sentience, particularly the capacity for pain, is a key property often discussed in relation to moral consideration.
    • The relationship between moral obligations and rights is a fundamental topic in philosophy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To establish that animals possess moral standing.
    • To argue for the existence of moral obligations humans have towards animals.
    • To demonstrate that animals possess rights correlative to these obligations.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical argumentation
    • Conceptual analysis of moral standing
    • Logical deduction based on the correlativity of rights and obligations
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral Research

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Animals have properties, such as the ability to feel pain, that grant them moral standing.
    • Humans have moral obligations toward animals.
    • Animals possess rights that are logically derived from human obligations.

    Conclusions:

    • The recognition of animal sentience necessitates their inclusion within the scope of moral concern.
    • The framework of rights and obligations logically extends to non-human animals.
    • This philosophical stance supports the ethical treatment and protection of animals.