Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Case vignette: unanticipated propinquity.

Paul S Appelbaum, Richard Bourne, Philip J Candilis

    Ethics & Behavior
    |January 1, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Human rights-based mental healthcare: new developments, introducing a themed series of papers.

    BJPsych open·2026
    Same author

    Return of results is important to heterogeneous research participants: A single-site survey.

    Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
    Same author

    Jailing People With Mental Illness While Awaiting Commitment Hearings.

    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2026
    Same author

    Imputing Parental Genotypes Through Mendelian Imputation: Ethical and Legal Considerations.

    Behavior genetics·2026
    Same author

    Serious Mental Illness, Dependence, and Care: California's Legal Initiatives on Grave Disability.

    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2025
    Same author

    The Make America Healthy Again Commission and Mental Health Distrust.

    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2025

    A psychotherapist faces a confidentiality dilemma when a patient sues her former divorce attorney, who is also the therapist's patient. The therapist must navigate ethical obligations and potential conflicts of interest.

    Area of Science:

    • * Psychiatry and Law
    • * Clinical Psychology
    • * Medical Ethics

    Background:

    • * A psychotherapist is treating a patient experiencing emotional and financial distress following a contentious divorce.
    • * The patient decides to sue her former divorce attorney for malpractice, believing his representation was inadequate.
    • * The psychotherapist is asked to testify as an expert witness regarding the patient's emotional harm and treatment costs.

    Observation:

    • * The psychotherapist discovers the attorney being sued is also her patient, treated for major depression.
    • * The therapist realizes her patient's depression may have compromised his professional judgment during the divorce proceedings.
    • * The therapist is bound by confidentiality regarding both patients, creating a significant ethical conflict.

    Findings:

    Keywords:
    Legal ApproachMental Health TherapiesProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

    • * The psychotherapist faces a dual-client conflict, where testifying for one patient could breach confidentiality with the other.
    • * The therapist's knowledge of the attorney's mental health history presents a complex ethical challenge.
    • * The situation highlights the intersection of therapeutic relationships and legal proceedings.

    Implications:

    • * This case underscores the critical importance of managing dual relationships and potential conflicts of interest in psychotherapy.
    • * It raises questions about the therapist's duty to warn versus the duty of confidentiality when legal action is involved.
    • * The scenario necessitates careful ethical consideration and potentially consultation with legal and ethical experts to resolve the dilemma.