Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is optimistic bias influenced by control or delay?

J M Kos1, V A Clarke

  • 1School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia.

Health Education Research
|October 26, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unrealistic optimism and the Health Belief Model.

Journal of behavioral medicine·2000
Same author

Breast self-examination training: a brief review.

Cancer nursing·1999
Same author

Older women's illness representations of cancer: a qualitative study.

Health education research·1999
Same author

Colorectal cancer: a survey of community beliefs and behaviours in Victoria.

The Medical journal of Australia·1998
Same author

Community (mis)understanding of colorectal cancer treatment.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery·1998
Same author

Understanding suicide among indigenous adolescents: a review using the PRECEDE model.

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention·1997

Optimistic bias, the tendency to underestimate personal risk, was greater for events perceived as controllable. This bias, however, did not differ based on the event

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Science
  • Health Psychology

Background:

  • Optimistic bias is a prevalent cognitive bias where individuals perceive their risk of negative events as lower than that of others.
  • The underlying mechanisms and influencing factors of optimistic bias, particularly concerning different event characteristics, remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether optimistic bias varies based on the perceived controllability and delay associated with negative life events.
  • To examine the relationship between event characteristics (control and delay) and the magnitude of optimistic bias.

Main Methods:

  • A sample of 100 adults (aged 18-30) was recruited via telephone directory.
  • Participants were interviewed to assess their perceived personal risk versus average risk for four negative events: skin cancer, car accidents (driver/passenger), and hearing aid use.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Perceptions of control and delay for each event were also assessed, followed by repeated-measures MANOVA for data analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Optimistic bias was evident across all four negative life events studied.
    • A significantly greater optimistic bias was observed for events perceived as high in control (skin cancer, driving accident) compared to low-control events (passenger accident, hearing aid use).
    • The perceived delay associated with an event did not significantly influence the magnitude of optimistic bias.

    Conclusions:

    • Perceived control is a significant factor modulating optimistic bias, with higher control leading to greater bias.
    • Delay does not appear to be a significant moderator of optimistic bias.
    • Findings have implications for designing targeted health promotion strategies and encouraging self-protective behaviors by considering perceived event controllability.